Literature DB >> 18318426

Required pecking and refraining from pecking alter judgments of time by pigeons.

Thomas R Zentall1, Rebecca A Singer.   

Abstract

There is evidence that humans' perception of time is affected by the activity in which they are engaged while they are timing. The more demanding the task, the faster time appears to pass. A similar effect has been found in pigeons. Pigeons trained to discriminate between a short-duration (2-sec) and a long-duration (10-sec) stimulus were required to peck when the stimulus was one color and to refrain from pecking when it was a different color. On probe trials of intermediate durations, the bisection point (50% choice of the stimulus associated with both long and short stimuli) for trials in which the pigeons were required to peck was almost 1 sec longer than on trials in which the pigeons were required to refrain from pecking (Zentall, Friedrich, & Clement, 2006). In the present research, we replicated this effect and determined the relation between this effect and the typical bisection point that occurs when pecking is permitted but not required. Results indicated that the typical procedure results in a bisection point that is between required pecking and refraining from pecking. Furthermore, the rate of pecking when pecking is allowed but not required also falls between the rate of pecking for the required-pecking and refrain-from-pecking conditions. This result suggests that, similar to humans, pigeons underestimate the passage of time when they are active or when attention to time-related cues has to be shared with attention to satisfying the response requirement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18318426     DOI: 10.3758/lb.36.1.55

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  8 in total

1.  Differential effects of auditory and visual signals on clock speed and temporal memory.

Authors:  T B Penney; J Gibbon; W H Meck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Scaling of stimulus duration by pigeons.

Authors:  D A Stubbs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Required pecking alters judgments of the passage of time by pigeons.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Andrea M Friedrich; Tricia S Clement
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

4.  Duration Ratings as an Index of Processing Resources Required for Cognitive Tasks.

Authors:  Garvin Chastain; F Richard Ferraro
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  1997-01

5.  Time estimation methods--do they influence prospective duration estimates?

Authors:  D Zakay
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Bisection of temporal intervals by pigeons.

Authors:  J R Platt; E R Davis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1983-04

7.  Time estimation: the effect of cortically mediated attention.

Authors:  Anthony Chaston; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Signal intensity and duration estimation in rats.

Authors:  P J Kraemer; R W Brown; C K Randall
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 1.777

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  The role of keypecking during filled intervals on the judgment of time for empty and filled intervals by pigeons.

Authors:  Angelo Santi; Allison Adams; Julia Bassett
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Interactions of numerical and temporal stimulus characteristics on the control of response location by brief flashes of light.

Authors:  J Gregor Fetterman; P Richard Killeen
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  To peck or not peck: Which do pigeons prefer?

Authors:  Danielle M Andrews; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  The effect of filled and empty intervals on clock and memory processes in pigeons.

Authors:  Elizabeth Price; Angelo Santi
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.926

Review 5.  Revisited: Pigeons Have Much Cognitive Behavior in Common With Humans.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-01-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.