Literature DB >> 17484432

Required pecking alters judgments of the passage of time by pigeons.

Thomas R Zentall1, Andrea M Friedrich, Tricia S Clement.   

Abstract

There is evidence that how humans perceive time is affected by the activity in which they are engaged when they are judging time. In humans, typically, the more demanding the task, the faster time seems to pass. We asked whether a similar effect could be found in pigeons. Pigeons were trained to discriminate between a short- (2-sec) and a long- (10-sec) duration stimulus. Depending on the color of the stimulus (white or blue), the pigeons were required to peck (at least once per second or the trial was aborted) or to refrain from pecking (pecks aborted the trial). Once these tasks had been acquired to a high degree, probe trials involving white and blue stimuli were presented at durations between 2 and 10 sec. On trials in which the pigeons were required to peck, the point of subjective equality (i.e., the point at which pigeons are equally likely to choose the stimulus associated with long stimuli as the stimulus associated with short stimuli) was almost 1 sec longer than on trials in which th epigeons were required to refrain from pecking. In other words, on trials that required pecking, more time passed before the pigeons indicated that the probe duration was at the subjective midpoint between 2 and 10 sec than on trials that did not require pecking. This result suggests that like humans, the pigeons underestimated the passage of time when they were active or when attention to time-related cues had to be shared with attention to satisfying the response rate requirement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17484432     DOI: 10.3758/bf03213922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  11 in total

1.  The perception of empty and filled time intervals by pigeons.

Authors:  Andrew Miki; Angelo Santi
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2005-01

2.  Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: A meta-analytic review.

Authors:  R A Block; D Zakay
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

3.  Duration Ratings as an Index of Processing Resources Required for Cognitive Tasks.

Authors:  Garvin Chastain; F Richard Ferraro
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  1997-01

4.  Timing light and tone signals in pigeons.

Authors:  W A Roberts; K Cheng; J S Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1989-01

5.  Discrimination of stimulus duration and d-amphetamine in pigeons: a psychophysical analysis.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; J R Thomas
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1974-05-15

6.  Time estimation methods--do they influence prospective duration estimates?

Authors:  D Zakay
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Bisection of temporal intervals by pigeons.

Authors:  J R Platt; E R Davis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1983-04

8.  Time estimation: the effect of cortically mediated attention.

Authors:  Anthony Chaston; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Signal intensity and duration estimation in rats.

Authors:  P J Kraemer; R W Brown; C K Randall
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Methamphetamine and time estimation.

Authors:  A V Maricq; S Roberts; R M Church
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1981-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  Required pecking and refraining from pecking alter judgments of time by pigeons.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Rebecca A Singer
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  The role of keypecking during filled intervals on the judgment of time for empty and filled intervals by pigeons.

Authors:  Angelo Santi; Allison Adams; Julia Bassett
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 3.  Effect of Environmental Enrichment on the Brain and on Learning and Cognition by Animals.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.