Literature DB >> 18317956

Providing metrics and performance feedback in a surgical simulator.

Christopher Sewell1, Dan Morris, Nikolas H Blevins, Sanjeev Dutta, Sumit Agrawal, Federico Barbagli, Kenneth Salisbury.   

Abstract

One of the most important advantages of computer simulators for surgical training is the opportunity they afford for independent learning. However, if the simulator does not provide useful instructional feedback to the user, this advantage is significantly blunted by the need for an instructor to supervise and tutor the trainee while using the simulator. Thus, the incorporation of relevant, intuitive metrics is essential to the development of efficient simulators. Equally as important is the presentation of such metrics to the user in such a way so as to provide constructive feedback that facilitates independent learning and improvement. This paper presents a number of novel metrics for the automated evaluation of surgical technique. The general approach was to take criteria that are intuitive to surgeons and develop ways to quantify them in a simulator. Although many of the concepts behind these metrics have wide application throughout surgery, they have been implemented specifically in the context of a simulation of mastoidectomy. First, the visuohaptic simulator itself is described, followed by the details of a wide variety of metrics designed to assess the user's performance. We present mechanisms for presenting visualizations and other feedback based on these metrics during a virtual procedure. We further describe a novel performance evaluation console that displays metric-based information during an automated debriefing session. Finally, the results of several user studies are reported, providing some preliminary validation of the simulator, the metrics, and the feedback mechanisms. Several machine learning algorithms, including Hidden Markov Models and a Naïve Bayes Classifier, are applied to our simulator data to automatically differentiate users' expertise levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18317956     DOI: 10.3109/10929080801957712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Aided Surg        ISSN: 1092-9088


  11 in total

Review 1.  Training and simulation in otolaryngology.

Authors:  Gregory J Wiet; Don Stredney; Dinah Wan
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Virtual temporal bone dissection system: OSU virtual temporal bone system: development and testing.

Authors:  Gregory J Wiet; Don Stredney; Thomas Kerwin; Bradley Hittle; Soledad A Fernandez; Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul; D Bradley Welling
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Automatic scoring of virtual mastoidectomies using expert examples.

Authors:  Thomas Kerwin; Gregory Wiet; Don Stredney; Han-Wei Shen
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Assessment of skills using a virtual reality temporal bone surgery simulator.

Authors:  R Linke; A Leichtle; F Sheikh; C Schmidt; H Frenzel; H Graefe; B Wollenberg; J E Meyer
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.124

Review 5.  Preoperative preparation for otologic surgery: temporal bone simulation.

Authors:  Rishabh Sethia; Gregory J Wiet
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 6.  Integration of high-resolution data for temporal bone surgical simulations.

Authors:  Gregory J Wiet; Don Stredney; Kimerly Powell; Brad Hittle; Thomas Kerwin
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Advanced head and neck surgery training during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Babak Givi; Michael G Moore; Arnaud F Bewley; Charles S Coffey; Marc A Cohen; Amy C Hessel; Scharukh Jalisi; Steven Kang; Jason G Newman; Liana Puscas; Maisie Shindo; Andrew Shuman; Punam Thakkar; Donald T Weed; Ara Chalian
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 3.147

8.  Face and content validity of a virtual-reality simulator for myringotomy with tube placement.

Authors:  Caiwen Huang; Horace Cheng; Yves Bureau; Sumit K Agrawal; Hanif M Ladak
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-10-20

9.  Elements of virtual temporal bone surgery: Manipulandum format may be more important to surgeons than haptic device force capabilities.

Authors:  Bertram Unger; Nariman Sepehri; Vivek Rampersad; Justyn Pisa; Jordan B Hochman
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-11-02

10.  Viewpoint matters: objective performance metrics for surgeon endoscope control during robot-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Anthony M Jarc; Myriam J Curet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.