Literature DB >> 18317714

[Hiatus hernia and recurrence : the Achilles heel of antireflux surgery?].

R Pointner1, F A Granderath.   

Abstract

Long-term studies show good postoperative results after laparoscopic antireflux surgery, but still approximately 10% of patients suffer from new or recurrent symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease. In the majority of cases the symptoms are caused by morphological changes of the fundic wrap or are related to the hiatal closure. Closure of the esophageal hiatus is therefore becoming more and more the key point of antireflux surgery. The aim of this study was to show the problems caused by the esophageal hiatus and to offer possible solutions. Therefore 1,201 laparoscopic antireflux procedures and 240 refundoplications performed in our department between 1993 and 2007 were analyzed with respect to morphologic reasons for failures and the corresponding symptoms. The most common morphological reason for complications after surgery was failure of the hiatal closure with consecutive intrathoracic migration of the fundic wrap, the so-called slipped Nissen. In the past the typical problems after open antireflux surgery were either that the wrap was too loose, a breakdown of the wrap or a so-called telescope phenomenon, all caused by failure of the fundic wrap and now a rarity since laparoscopic surgery. Even after repeated laparoscopic refundoplications the main problem was always the hiatus. This shows the importance of the crural closure and the necessity of a specific definition of size and form of the hiatus.The aim of this study was to initiate a discussion leading to a new definition of the hiatus with the focus on the "hiatal surface area" for a better basis for comparison of the published results of antireflux or hiatal surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18317714     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-008-1496-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  41 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Nissen antireflux procedure by esophageal manometry and twenty-four hour pH monitoring.

Authors:  T R DeMeester; L F Johnson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  [A simple operation for control of reflux esophagitis].

Authors:  R NISSEN
Journal:  Schweiz Med Wochenschr       Date:  1956-05-18

3.  Reflux esophagitis, sliding hiatal hernia, and the anatomy of repair.

Authors:  P R ALLISON
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1951-04

4.  Hiatus hernia: (a 20-year retrospective survey).

Authors:  P R Allison
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Laparoscopic management of giant type III hiatal hernia and short esophagus. Objective follow-up at three years.

Authors:  Blair A Jobe; Ralph W Aye; Clifford W Deveney; John S Domreis; Lucius D Hill
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  The history of hiatal hernia surgery: from Bowditch to laparoscopy.

Authors:  Nicholas Stylopoulos; David W Rattner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hernia is associated with a low incidence of recurrence and reoperation.

Authors:  J J Andujar; P K Papasavas; T Birdas; J Robke; Y Raftopoulos; D J Gagné; P F Caushaj; R J Landreneau; R J Keenan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Failure of antireflux surgery: causes and management strategies.

Authors:  H J Stein; H Feussner; J R Siewert
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Laparoscopic management of large paraesophageal hiatal hernia.

Authors:  P C Leeder; G Smith; T C B Dehn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic antireflux surgery: tailoring the hiatal closure to the size of hiatal surface area.

Authors:  F A Granderath; U M Schweiger; R Pointner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 3.453

View more
  8 in total

1.  Post-fundoplication contrast studies: is there room for improvement?

Authors:  M C Raeside; D Madigan; J C Myers; P G Devitt; G G Jamieson; S K Thompson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  [Stretch sphincter of the esophagus : Paradoxical sphincter with angiomyoelastic architecture].

Authors:  F Stelzner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Influence of the size of the hiatus on the rate of reherniation after laparoscopic fundoplication and refundopilication with mesh hiatoplasty.

Authors:  Oliver O Koch; Kai U Asche; Johannes Berger; Eva Weber; Frank A Granderath; Rudolph Pointner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic anterior hemifundoplication and hiatoplasty for the treatment of upside-down stomach: mid- and long-term results after 40 patients.

Authors:  Firas W Obeidat; Reinhold A Lang; Andreas Knauf; Michael N Thomas; Tanija K Hüttl; Nico P Zügel; Karl-Walter Jauch; Thomas P Hüttl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Christian A Gutschow; Arnulf H Hölscher
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  MRI patterns of Nissen fundoplication: normal appearance and mechanisms of failure.

Authors:  Christiane Kulinna-Cosentini; Wolfgang Schima; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah; Enrico P Cosentini
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  The esophageal hiatus: what is the normal size?

Authors:  A Shamiyeh; K Szabo; F A Granderath; G Syré; W Wayand; J Zehetner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Swallowing MRI-a reliable method for the evaluation of the postoperative gastroesophageal situs after Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  Michael A Arnoldner; Ivan Kristo; Matthias Paireder; Enrico P Cosentini; Wolfgang Schima; Michael Weber; Sebastian F Schoppmann; Christiane Kulinna-Cosentini
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.315

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.