Literature DB >> 18316711

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Christian P DiPaola1, Robert W Molinari.   

Abstract

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) create intervertebral fusion by means of a posterior approach. Both techniques are useful in managing degenerative disk disease, severe instability, spondylolisthesis, deformity, and pseudarthrosis. Successful results have been reported with allograft, various cages (for interbody support), autograft, and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Interbody fusion techniques may facilitate reduction and enhance fusion. The rationale for PLIF and TLIF is biomechanically sound. However, clinical outcomes of different anterior and posterior spinal fusion techniques tend to be similar. PLIF has a high complication rate (dural tear, 5.4% to 10%; neurologic injury, 9% to 16%). These findings, coupled with the versatility of TLIF throughout the entire lumbar spine, may make TLIF the ideal choice for an all-posterior interbody fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18316711     DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200803000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  52 in total

1.  Lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the correction of spondylolisthesis and adult degenerative scoliosis in high-risk patients: early radiographic results and complications.

Authors:  Brad Waddell; David Briski; Rabah Qadir; Gustavo Godoy; Allison Howard Houston; Ernest Rudman; Joseph Zavatsky
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

Review 2.  A systematic review with meta-analysis of posterior interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Xiaoyang Liu; Yipeng Wang; Guixing Qiu; Xisheng Weng; Bin Yu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-30       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Current concepts on spinal arthrodesis in degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Marios G Lykissas; Alexander Aichmair
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 4.  [The PLIF and TLIF techniques. Indication, technique, advantages, and disadvantages].

Authors:  C Fleege; M Rickert; M Rauschmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  Complications of the lateral transpsoas approach for lumbar interbody arthrodesis: a case series and literature review.

Authors:  D'Mitri A Sofianos; Michael R Briseño; Joshua Abrams; Alpesh A Patel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Interspinous spacers versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Authors:  Yifeng Cai; Jiaquan Luo; Junjun Huang; Chengjie Lian; Hang Zhou; Hao Yao; Peiqiang Su
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  PLIF and modified TLIF using the PLIF approach.

Authors:  Hossein Mehdian; Manish Kothari
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Comparison between free-hand and O-arm-based navigated posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly cohorts with three-level lumbar degenerative disease.

Authors:  Yucheng Wang; Kangwu Chen; Hao Chen; Kai Zhang; Jian Lu; Haiqing Mao; Huilin Yang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  Fusion rates of instrumented lumbar spinal arthrodesis according to surgical approach: a systematic review of randomized trials.

Authors:  Choon Sung Lee; Chang Ju Hwang; Dong-Ho Lee; Yung-Tae Kim; Hee Sang Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-02-15

10.  Clinical outcomes and considerations of the lumbar interbody fusion technique for lumbar disk disease in adolescents.

Authors:  Dae-Woong Kwon; Kyung-Hyun Kim; Jeong-Yoon Park; Dong-Kyu Chin; Keun-Su Kim; Young-Eun Cho; Sung-Uk Kuh
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 1.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.