BACKGROUND: The lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine was developed to eliminate the need for an anterior-approach surgeon and retraction of the great vessels and has the potential for shorter operative times. However, the reported complications associated with this approach vary. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We identified the incidence of complications associated with the lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 45 patients who underwent a lateral transpsoas approach to the spine for various diagnoses between January 1, 2006, and October 31, 2010. The patients' average age was 63.3 years. Sixteen (35.6%) patients had prior lumbar spinal surgery. Twenty-one patients (46.7%) underwent supplemental posterior instrumentation. Minimum followup was 0 months (mean, 11 months; range, 0-34 months). RESULTS: Eighteen of the 45 patients (40%) had complications: 10 (22.2%) developed postoperative iliopsoas weakness, three had quadriceps weakness, and one experienced foot drop. Eight patients (17.8%) developed anterior thigh hypoesthesia, which did not fully resolve in seven of the eight patients at an average of 9 months' followup. Three patients had postoperative radiculopathies, one a durotomy, and one died postoperatively from a pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSIONS: We found a 40% incidence of complications and a nontrivial frequency and severity of postoperative weakness, numbness, and radicular pain in patients who underwent a lateral transpsoas approach to the spine. Given the expanding use of the approach, a thorough understanding of the risks associated with it is essential for patient education, medical decision making, and identifying methods of reducing such complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
BACKGROUND: The lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine was developed to eliminate the need for an anterior-approach surgeon and retraction of the great vessels and has the potential for shorter operative times. However, the reported complications associated with this approach vary. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We identified the incidence of complications associated with the lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 45 patients who underwent a lateral transpsoas approach to the spine for various diagnoses between January 1, 2006, and October 31, 2010. The patients' average age was 63.3 years. Sixteen (35.6%) patients had prior lumbar spinal surgery. Twenty-one patients (46.7%) underwent supplemental posterior instrumentation. Minimum followup was 0 months (mean, 11 months; range, 0-34 months). RESULTS: Eighteen of the 45 patients (40%) had complications: 10 (22.2%) developed postoperative iliopsoas weakness, three had quadriceps weakness, and one experienced foot drop. Eight patients (17.8%) developed anterior thigh hypoesthesia, which did not fully resolve in seven of the eight patients at an average of 9 months' followup. Three patients had postoperative radiculopathies, one a durotomy, and one died postoperatively from a pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSIONS: We found a 40% incidence of complications and a nontrivial frequency and severity of postoperative weakness, numbness, and radicular pain in patients who underwent a lateral transpsoas approach to the spine. Given the expanding use of the approach, a thorough understanding of the risks associated with it is essential for patient education, medical decision making, and identifying methods of reducing such complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Authors: Rick C Sasso; Natalie M Best; Praveen V Mummaneni; Thomas M Reilly; Sajjad M Hussain Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: John K Czerwein; Nikhil Thakur; Stephen J Migliori; Philip Lucas; Mark Palumbo Journal: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 3.020
Authors: Salvador A Brau; Rick B Delamarter; Michael L Schiffman; Lytton A Williams; Robert G Watkins Journal: Spine J Date: 2004 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: Gary A Fantini; Ioannis P Pappou; Federico P Girardi; Harvinder S Sandhu; Frank P Cammisa Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Jeffrey A Rihn; Ravi Patel; Junaid Makda; Joseph Hong; David G Anderson; Alexander R Vaccaro; Alan S Hilibrand; Todd J Albert Journal: Spine J Date: 2009-05-30 Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: Mustafa Alkadhim; Carmine Zoccali; Salman Abbasifard; Mauricio J Avila; Apar S Patel; Kamran Sattarov; Christina M Walter; Ali A Baaj Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2015-10-20 Impact factor: 3.134