Literature DB >> 18316489

Improving hypertension control in diabetes mellitus: the effects of collaborative and proactive health communication.

Aanand D Naik1, Michael A Kallen, Annette Walder, Richard L Street.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Communication between patients and clinicians using collaborative goals and treatment plans may overcome barriers to achieving hypertension control in routine diabetes mellitus care. We assessed the interrelation of patient-clinician communication factors to determine their independent associations with hypertension control in diabetes care. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We identified 566 older adults with diabetes mellitus and hypertension at the DeBakey VA Medical Center in Houston, Tex. Clinical and pharmacy data were collected, and a patient questionnaire was sent to all participants. A total of 212 individuals returned surveys. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the effect of patient characteristics, self-management behaviors, and communication factors on hypertension control. Three communication factors had significant associations with hypertension control. Two factors, patients' endorsement of a shared decision-making style (odds ratio 1.61, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 2.57) and proactive communication with one's clinician about abnormal results of blood pressure self-monitoring (odds ratio 1.89, 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 3.26), had direct, independent associations in multivariate regression. Path analysis was used to investigate the direct and indirect effects of communication factors and hypertension control. Decision-making style (beta=0.20, P<0.01) and proactive communication (beta=0.50, P<0.0001) again demonstrated direct effects on hypertension control. A third factor, clinicians' use of collaborative communication when setting treatment goals, had a total effect on hypertension control of 0.16 (P<0.05) through its direct effects on decision-making style (beta=0.28, P<0.001) and proactive communication (beta=0.22, P<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Three communication factors were found to have significant associations with hypertension control. Patient-clinician communication that facilitates collaborative blood pressure goals and patients' input related to the progress of treatment may improve rates of hypertension control in diabetes care independent of medication adherence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18316489      PMCID: PMC3717409          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.724005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  44 in total

1.  Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model.

Authors:  C Charles; A Gafni; T Whelan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  Barriers to hypertension control.

Authors:  Ann M Borzecki; Susan A Oliveria; Dan R Berlowitz
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 3.  Improving blood pressure control by tailored feedback to patients and clinicians.

Authors:  Hayden B Bosworth; Maren K Olsen; Eugene Z Oddone
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Prevalence of comorbid hypertension and dyslipidemia and associated cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Michael L Johnson; Kenneth Pietz; David S Battleman; Rebecca J Beyth
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Hypertension knowledge, awareness, and attitudes in a hypertensive population.

Authors:  Susan A Oliveria; Roland S Chen; Bruce D McCarthy; Catherine C Davis; Martha N Hill
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC).

Authors:  Russell E Glasgow; Edward H Wagner; Judith Schaefer; Lisa D Mahoney; Robert J Reid; Sarah M Greene
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-09-12

8.  Will older persons and their clinicians use a shared decision-making instrument?

Authors:  Aanand D Naik; Dena Schulman-Green; Ruth McCorkle; Elizabeth H Bradley; Sidney T Bogardus
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making?

Authors:  R B Deber; N Kraetschmer; J Irvine
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1996-07-08

Review 10.  Systematic review of randomised trials of interventions to assist patients to follow prescriptions for medications.

Authors:  R B Haynes; K A McKibbon; R Kanani
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-08-10       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  67 in total

1.  Subjective numeracy and preference to stay with the status quo.

Authors:  Liana Fraenkel; Meaghan Cunningham; Ellen Peters
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Patient-reported use of collaborative goal setting and glycemic control among patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Jennifer Elston Lafata; Heather L Morris; Elizabeth Dobie; Michele Heisler; Rachel M Werner; Levent Dumenci
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-02-19

3.  Impact of targeted health promotion on cardiovascular knowledge among American Indians and Alaska Natives.

Authors:  Angela G Brega; Katherine A Pratte; Luohua Jiang; Christina M Mitchell; Sarah A Stotz; Crystal Loudhawk-Hedgepeth; Brad D Morse; Tim Noe; Kelly R Moore; Janette Beals
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2013-06

4.  Patient experiences with surveillance endoscopy: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jennifer Arney; Marilyn Hinojosa-Lindsey; Richard L Street; Jason Hou; Hashem B El-Serag; Aanand D Naik
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Effect of continuity of care on hospital utilization for seniors with multiple medical conditions in an integrated health care system.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Bayliss; Jennifer L Ellis; Jo Ann Shoup; Chan Zeng; Deanna B McQuillan; John F Steiner
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Factors Influencing Physician Counseling on Cardiovascular Risk.

Authors:  Val Rakita; Carol J Homko; Abul Kashem; Nabeel Memon; Alfred A Bove
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2015-11-16

7.  Shared decision-making in the selection of outpatient analgesics for older individuals in the emergency department.

Authors:  Cameron G Isaacs; Christine Kistler; Katherine M Hunold; Greg F Pereira; Mara Buchbinder; Mark A Weaver; Samuel A McLean; Timothy F Platts-Mills
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Exploring the influence of patient-provider communication on intraocular pressure in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Delesha M Carpenter; Gail E Tudor; Robyn Sayner; Kelly W Muir; Alan L Robin; Susan J Blalock; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Annette L Giangiacomo; Betsy L Sleath
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-07-06

9.  The effectiveness of health coaching, home blood pressure monitoring, and home-titration in controlling hypertension among low-income patients: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Heather Bennett; Kelsey Laird; David Margolius; Victoria Ngo; David H Thom; Thomas Bodenheimer
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Consideration of shared decision making in nursing: a review of clinicians' perceptions and interventions.

Authors:  Noreen M Clark; Belinda W Nelson; Melissa A Valerio; Z Molly Gong; Judith C Taylor-Fishwick; Monica Fletcher
Journal:  Open Nurs J       Date:  2009-10-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.