Literature DB >> 15836524

Hypertension knowledge, awareness, and attitudes in a hypertensive population.

Susan A Oliveria1, Roland S Chen, Bruce D McCarthy, Catherine C Davis, Martha N Hill.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Improved recognition of the importance of systolic blood pressure (SBP) has been identified as one of the major public health and medical challenges in the prevention and treatment of hypertension (HTN). SBP is a strong independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease but no information is available on whether patients understand the importance of their SBP level. The purpose of this study was to assess HTN knowledge, awareness, and attitudes, especially related to SBP in a hypertensive population. DESIGN/SETTING/PATIENTS: We identified patients with HTN (N=2,264) in the primary care setting of a large midwestern health system using automated claims data (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD-9] codes 401.0-401.9). We randomly selected 1,250 patients and, after excluding ineligible patients, report the results on 826 completed patient telephone interviews (72% response rate [826/1,151]). MAIN
RESULTS: Ninety percent of hypertensive patients knew that lowering blood pressure (BP) would improve health and 91% reported that a health care provider had told them that they have HTN or high BP. However, 41% of patients did not know their BP level. Eighty-two percent of all patients correctly identified the meaning of HTN as "high blood pressure." Thirty-four percent of patients correctly identified SBP as the "top" number of their reading; 32% correctly identified diastolic blood pressure (DBP) as the "bottom" number; and, overall, only 30% of patients were able to correctly identify both systolic and diastolic BP measures. Twenty-seven percent of patients with elevated SBP and DBP (as indicated by their medical records) perceived that their BP was high. Twenty-four percent of patients did not know the optimal level for either SBP or DBP. When asked whether the DBP or SBP level was more important in the control and prevention of disease, 41% reported DBP, 13% reported SBP, 30% reported that both were important, and 17% did not know.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that, although general knowledge and awareness of HTN is adequate, patients do not have a comprehensive understanding of this condition. For instance, patients do not recognize the importance of elevated SBP levels or the current status of their BP control. An opportunity exists to focus patient education programs and interventions on the cardiovascular risk associated with uncontrolled HTN, particularly elevated SBP levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15836524      PMCID: PMC1490067          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.30353.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  33 in total

1.  Evaluating hypertension control in a managed care setting.

Authors:  M Alexander; I Tekawa; E Hunkeler; B Fireman; R Rowell; J V Selby; B M Massie; W Cooper
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1999 Dec 13-27

Review 2.  Clinical Advisory Statement. Importance of systolic blood pressure in older Americans.

Authors:  J L Izzo; D Levy; H R Black
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Knowledge and attitudes towards hypertension and hypercholesterolemia in a population of southern Germany: results from a population survey in the Augsburg area.

Authors:  S K Weiland; U Keil; A Spelsberg
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1991

4.  A hypertension survey: respondents' knowledge of high blood pressure.

Authors:  C Hinds
Journal:  Int Nurs Rev       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.871

5.  The patient's view of hypertension and compliance.

Authors:  C M Sharkness; D A Snow
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Blood pressure awareness in Austria. A 20-year evaluation, 1978-1998.

Authors:  A Schmeiser-Rieder; U Kunze
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Physician-related barriers to the effective management of uncontrolled hypertension.

Authors:  Susan A Oliveria; Pablo Lapuerta; Bruce D McCarthy; Gilbert J L'Italien; Dan R Berlowitz; Steven M Asch
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-02-25

8.  Usefulness of a systemic hypertension in-hospital educational program.

Authors:  R A González-Fernández; M Rivera; D Torres; J Quiles; A Jackson
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1990-06-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  The National High Blood Pressure Education Program: measuring progress and assessing its impact.

Authors:  E J Roccella; M J Horan
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.267

10.  The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  60 in total

1.  The process-knowledge model of health literacy: evidence from a componential analysis of two commonly used measures.

Authors:  Jessie Chin; Daniel G Morrow; Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow; Thembi Conner-Garcia; James F Graumlich; Michael D Murray
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2011

2.  Impact of community pharmacy-based educational intervention on patients with hypertension in Western Nepal.

Authors:  Sushmita Sharma; Bhuvan Kc; Alian A Alrasheedy; Atisammodavardhana Kaundinnyayana; Aarjan Khanal
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2014-07-31

3.  Differences and similarities in explanatory models of hypertension in the United States of america, Tanzania and Jamaica.

Authors:  J D Purakal; J Williams-Johnson; E W Williams; S Pemba; J Kambona; R Welch; J Flack; P Levy
Journal:  West Indian Med J       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 0.171

4.  The development and validation of the hypertension evaluation of lifestyle and management knowledge scale.

Authors:  Marilyn M Schapira; Kathlyn E Fletcher; Avery Hayes; Dan Eastwood; Leslie Patterson; Kristyn Ertl; Jeff Whittle
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Adherence to antihypertensive medications among family practice patients with diabetes mellitus and hypertension.

Authors:  Nandini Natarajan; Wayne Putnam; Kristine Van Aarsen; Kristine Beverley Lawson; Fred Burge
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  A Framework for Using eHealth Interventions to Overcome Medical Mistrust Among Sexual Minority Men of Color Living with Chronic Conditions.

Authors:  S Raquel Ramos; Rueben Warren; Michele Shedlin; Gail Melkus; Trace Kershaw; Allison Vorderstrasse
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.104

7.  Knowledge of blood pressure in a U.K. general public population.

Authors:  J Slark; M S Khan; P Bentley; P Sharma
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 8.  Understanding the quality chasm for hypertension control in diabetes: a structured review of "co-maneuvers" used in clinical trials.

Authors:  Aanand D Naik; Tim T Issac; Richard L Street; Mark E Kunik
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.657

9.  Outcomes from a community-based hypertension educational programme: the West of Ireland Hypertension study.

Authors:  M Darrat; A Houlihan; I Gibson; M Rabbitt; G Flaherty; F Sharif
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 1.568

10.  Management of chronic hypertension in older men: an exploration of patient goal-setting.

Authors:  Vanessa A Brown; L Kay Bartholomew; Aanand D Naik
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2007-09-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.