Literature DB >> 18309894

[QUALIFY--a tool for assessing quality indicators].

Anne Reiter1, Burkhard Fischer, Joachim Kötting, Max Geraedts, Wilfried H Jäckel, Klaus Döbler.   

Abstract

Quality indicators are used world-wide to control the quality of health care. To be effective these indicators have to meet quality criteria themselves. But until now there has been no fully operational method for assessing indicators. Using a systematic review of existing criteria and scientific analyses the criteria set QUALIFY was developed. Particular characteristics of QUALIFY include clear definitions of all criteria, consistent information as the basis of assessment and a standardized approach throughout the assessment process. QUALIFY comprises 20 criteria which are assigned to the three categories relevance, scientific soundness and feasibility. It was tested during the assessment of 55 indicators and served as the methodological basis for selecting those quality indicators that German hospitals are required to report publicly.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18309894     DOI: 10.1016/j.zgesun.2007.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich        ISSN: 1431-7621


  20 in total

Review 1.  [Result-related success rates of cataract operations. Results of a systematic literature review].

Authors:  U Hahn; F Krummenauer; I Neuhann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Selection of hospital antimicrobial prescribing quality indicators: a consensus among German antibiotic stewardship (ABS) networkers.

Authors:  J Thern; K de With; R Strauss; M Steib-Bauert; N Weber; W V Kern
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  [Quality indicators for colon cancer surgery : Evidence-based development of a set of indicators for the outcome quality].

Authors:  J Hardt; H-J Buhr; C Klinger; S Benz; K Ludwig; J Kalff; S Post
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Physicians' knowledge of and compliance with guidelines: an exploratory study in cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Ute Karbach; Ingrid Schubert; Jens Hagemeister; Nicole Ernstmann; Holger Pfaff; Hans-Wilhelm Höpp
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  [DGPPN recommendations on quality indicators for schizophrenia].

Authors:  I Großimlinghaus; I Hauth; P Falkai; B Janssen; A Deister; A Meyer-Lindenberg; C Roth-Sackenheim; F Schneider; T Wobrock; R Zeidler; W Gaebel
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.214

6.  [Potential for the survey of quality indicators based on a national emergency department registry : A systematic literature search].

Authors:  A C Hörster; M Kulla; D Brammen; R Lefering
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 7.  Measuring the quality of pressure ulcer prevention: A systematic mapping review of quality indicators.

Authors:  Jan Kottner; Elisabeth Hahnel; Andrea Lichterfeld-Kottner; Ulrike Blume-Peytavi; Andreas Büscher
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  [Quality indicators for metabolic and bariatric surgery in Germany : Evidence-based development of an indicator panel for the quality of results, indications and structure].

Authors:  F Seyfried; H-J Buhr; C Klinger; T P Huettel; B Herbig; S Weiner; C Jurowich; A Dietrich
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  [MTL30 as surrogate parameter for quality of surgically treated diseases : Establishment based on the StuDoQ register of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery].

Authors:  A Wiegering; U Wellner; F Seyfried; J Hardt; C Klinger; H Buhr; S Post
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 10.  [Measurability of the quality of care of the severely injured].

Authors:  S Flohé; D Bieler; S Ruchholtz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.