Literature DB >> 34223917

[Measurability of the quality of care of the severely injured].

S Flohé1, D Bieler2,3, S Ruchholtz4.   

Abstract

The care of severely injured patients is characterized by the heterogeneity of the clinical picture and the time-critical aspects of many forms of treatment in the acute phase, so that quality measurement and assessment is always complex. In order to be able to operate a meaningful and structured quality management the quality must be validly measured and it must be defined what quality is. To handle this complex picture the quality of care for the severely injured is divided into three levels: structural quality, process quality and outcome quality. With respect to structural quality there are clear guidelines for personnel and structural equipment of hospitals for the optimal care of severely injured patients. This is regularly checked in Germany through trauma center certification as part of the TraumaNetzwerk DGU®. Process quality can also be measured in the care of severely injured patients. With the TraumaRegister DGU® annual report in 2017, 14 newly developed quality indicators were introduced. Due to the comprehensive participation of hospitals in the TraumaRegister DGU® structured external quality assurance is possible in addition to internal process analysis. With respect to the quality of the outcome patient reported outcome measures (PROM) have become increasingly more important in addition to the mortality. The PROMs that are used to assess the consequences of injuries are typically multidimensional and capture not only aspects of physical health but also enable self-assessment of the mental health status by the patient.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Outcome quality; Process quality; Quality management; Structural quality; TraumaNetzwerk DGU

Year:  2021        PMID: 34223917     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-021-01445-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  4 in total

1.  [Organizational, personnel and structural alterations due to participation in TraumaNetworkD DGU. The first stocktaking].

Authors:  C Mand; T Müller; S Ruchholtz; A Künzel; C A Kühne
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  [QUALIFY--a tool for assessing quality indicators].

Authors:  Anne Reiter; Burkhard Fischer; Joachim Kötting; Max Geraedts; Wilfried H Jäckel; Klaus Döbler
Journal:  Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich       Date:  2007

3.  Implementation of a nationwide trauma network for the care of severely injured patients.

Authors:  Steffen Ruchholtz; Rolf Lefering; Ulrike Lewan; Florian Debus; Carsten Mand; Hartmut Siebert; Christian A Kühne
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.313

4.  Polytrauma outcome: implementation of health-related quality of life assessment into the German Trauma Registry.

Authors:  Oliver Kamp; Roman Pfeifer; Michaela Ritschel; Sascha Flohe; Dan Bieler
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.693

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.