Literature DB >> 22534745

[Result-related success rates of cataract operations. Results of a systematic literature review].

U Hahn1, F Krummenauer, I Neuhann.   

Abstract

This systematic literature review, including 7 publications released since 2000, provides references for outcome indicators of cataract surgery for quality management initiatives. The reported relative numbers of cases achieving visual rehabilitation and refractive accuracy were determined and compared. With one exception the success rates did not represent benchmarks defined as best possible outcome but describe the results of data collected in a population during routine clinical practice. A best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of ≥ 0.5 was achieved in 84-93% of all patients and in 95-99% of patients without preoperative visually impairing comorbidities. A refractive accuracy (absolute deviation of target refraction from spherical equivalent) of ≤ 1 D was reported in 72-97% of the patients. The success rates of these well established outcome indicator levels were high. Differences between operators were more distinguishable and the clinical relevance higher with less liberal indicator levels. A BCVA ≥ 1 was realized in 30-47% of all patients and in 52-62% of patients without visually impairing comorbidities. A total of 45-80% of the patients showed a refractive accuracy of ≤ 0.5 D. Exogenous factors not influencable by the surgeon have a relevant impact on the success rates. The literature review confirms the strong association of visually impairing comorbidities and BCVA outcome. Based on literature methodological problems of quality management systems for cataract surgery are discussed. While voluntary initiatives have the ability to solve these difficulties appropriate concepts for mandatory procedures are currently lacking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22534745     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-012-2577-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  19 in total

1.  Cataract surgery quality, streetlamps, and car keys.

Authors:  Roger F Steinert
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Learning from the best leads to superior performance.

Authors:  R C Camp
Journal:  J Bus Strategy       Date:  1992 May-Jun

3.  Usefulness of short-term data for evaluating cataract surgery outcomes.

Authors:  Sebastian Briesen; Daniel Martin Handzel; Raimund Remmel; Claudia Dardenne
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  [QUALIFY--a tool for assessing quality indicators].

Authors:  Anne Reiter; Burkhard Fischer; Joachim Kötting; Max Geraedts; Wilfried H Jäckel; Klaus Döbler
Journal:  Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich       Date:  2007

5.  Raising the benchmark for the 21st century--the 1000 cataract operations audit and survey: outcomes, consultant-supervised training and sourcing NHS choice.

Authors:  Farhan H Zaidi; Melanie C Corbett; Ben J L Burton; Philip A Bloom
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  1998 European Cataract Outcome Study: report from the European Cataract Outcome Study Group.

Authors:  M Lundström; P Barry; E Leite; H Seward; U Stenevi
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  The Cataract National Dataset electronic multi-centre audit of 55,567 operations: updating benchmark standards of care in the United Kingdom and internationally.

Authors:  P Jaycock; R L Johnston; H Taylor; M Adams; D M Tole; P Galloway; C Canning; J M Sparrow
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Racial differences in lens opacities: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation (SEE) project.

Authors:  S K West; B Muñoz; O D Schein; D D Duncan; G S Rubin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  The Swedish National Cataract Register: A 9-year review.

Authors:  Mats Lundström; Ulf Stenevi; William Thorburn
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2002-06

10.  Factors related to the degree of success in achieving target refraction in cataract surgery: Swedish National Cataract Register study.

Authors:  Maria Kugelberg; Mats Lundström
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.351

View more
  4 in total

1.  DMEK in phakic eyes: targeted therapy or highway to cataract surgery?

Authors:  Enken Gundlach; Anna-Karina B Maier; Mikaella-Anthia Tsangaridou; Aline Isabel Riechardt; Tobias Brockmann; Eckart Bertelmann; Antonia M Joussen; Necip Torun
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Benchmarks for outcome indicators in pediatric cataract surgery.

Authors:  B R Nihalani; D K VanderVeen
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 3.  Immediate versus Delayed Sequential Bilateral Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Monali S Malvankar-Mehta; Yufeng Nancy Chen; Sangita Patel; Angela Pui-Kei Leung; Man Mohan Merchea; William G Hodge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A methodological approach to identify external factors for indicator-based risk adjustment illustrated by a cataract surgery register.

Authors:  Ursula Hahn; Irmingard Neuhann; Stefanie Schmickler; Frank Krummenauer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.