Literature DB >> 18308587

A novel technique for modeling susceptibility-based contrast mechanisms for arbitrary microvascular geometries: the finite perturber method.

Arvind P Pathak1, B Douglas Ward, Kathleen M Schmainda.   

Abstract

Recently, we demonstrated that vessel geometry is a significant determinant of susceptibility-induced contrast in MRI. This is especially relevant for susceptibility-contrast enhanced MRI of tumors with their characteristically abnormal vessel morphology. In order to better understand the biophysics of this contrast mechanism, it is of interest to model how various factors, including microvessel morphology contribute to the measured MR signal, and was the primary motivation for developing a novel computer modeling approach called the Finite Perturber Method (FPM). The FPM circumvents the limitations of traditional fixed-geometry approaches, and enables us to study susceptibility-induced contrast arising from arbitrary microvascular morphologies in 3D, such as those typically observed with brain tumor angiogenesis. Here we describe this new modeling methodology and some of its applications. The excellent agreement of the FPM with theory and the extant susceptibility modeling data, coupled with its computational efficiency demonstrates its potential to transform our understanding of the factors that engender susceptibility contrast in MRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18308587      PMCID: PMC2408763          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  26 in total

1.  MR-derived cerebral blood volume maps: issues regarding histological validation and assessment of tumor angiogenesis.

Authors:  A P Pathak; K M Schmainda; B D Ward; J R Linderman; K J Rebro; A S Greene
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Quantifying arbitrary magnetic susceptibility distributions with MR.

Authors:  Lin Li; John S Leigh
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Perturbation method for magnetic field calculations of nonconductive objects.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; James L Wilson; Peter Jezzard
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of blood vessels at high fields: in vivo and in vitro measurements and image simulation.

Authors:  S Ogawa; T M Lee
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  MR contrast due to microscopically heterogeneous magnetic susceptibility: numerical simulations and applications to cerebral physiology.

Authors:  C R Fisel; J L Ackerman; R B Buxton; L Garrido; J W Belliveau; B R Rosen; T J Brady
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  MR diffusion imaging of the human brain.

Authors:  D Chien; R B Buxton; K K Kwong; T J Brady; B R Rosen
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Perfusion imaging with NMR contrast agents.

Authors:  B R Rosen; J W Belliveau; J M Vevea; T J Brady
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Intravascular susceptibility contrast mechanisms in tissues.

Authors:  R P Kennan; J Zhong; J C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  The effect of brain tumor angiogenesis on the in vivo relationship between the gradient-echo relaxation rate change (DeltaR2*) and contrast agent (MION) dose.

Authors:  Arvind P Pathak; Scott D Rand; Kathleen M Schmainda
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  The vasculature of experimental brain tumours. Part 2. A quantitative assessment of morphological abnormalities.

Authors:  B R Deane; P L Lantos
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.181

View more
  38 in total

Review 1.  Multiscale imaging and computational modeling of blood flow in the tumor vasculature.

Authors:  Eugene Kim; Spyros Stamatelos; Jana Cebulla; Zaver M Bhujwalla; Aleksander S Popel; Arvind P Pathak
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Quantifying the microvascular origin of BOLD-fMRI from first principles with two-photon microscopy and an oxygen-sensitive nanoprobe.

Authors:  Louis Gagnon; Sava Sakadžić; Frédéric Lesage; Joseph J Musacchia; Joël Lefebvre; Qianqian Fang; Meryem A Yücel; Karleyton C Evans; Emiri T Mandeville; Jülien Cohen-Adad; Jonathan R Polimeni; Mohammad A Yaseen; Eng H Lo; Douglas N Greve; Richard B Buxton; Anders M Dale; Anna Devor; David A Boas
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Tracking and Quantification of Magnetically Labeled Stem Cells using Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Forrest Goodfellow; Gregory A Simchick; Luke J Mortensen; Steven L Stice; Qun Zhao
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 18.808

Review 4.  Vessel caliber--a potential MRI biomarker of tumour response in clinical trials.

Authors:  Kyrre E Emblem; Christian T Farrar; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Tracy T Batchelor; Ronald J H Borra; Bruce R Rosen; A Gregory Sorensen; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Validation and optimization of hypercapnic-calibrated fMRI from oxygen-sensitive two-photon microscopy.

Authors:  Louis Gagnon; Sava Sakadžić; Frédéric Lesage; Philippe Pouliot; Anders M Dale; Anna Devor; Richard B Buxton; David A Boas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Systematic assessment of multi-echo dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI using a digital reference object.

Authors:  Ashley M Stokes; Natenael B Semmineh; Ashley Nespodzany; Laura C Bell; C Chad Quarles
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Dependence of the MR signal on the magnetic susceptibility of blood studied with models based on real microvascular networks.

Authors:  Xiaojun Cheng; Avery J L Berman; Jonathan R Polimeni; Richard B Buxton; Louis Gagnon; Anna Devor; Sava Sakadžić; David A Boas
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Influence of the size and curvedness of neural projections on the orientationally averaged diffusion MR signal.

Authors:  Evren Özarslan; Cem Yolcu; Magnus Herberthson; Hans Knutsson; Carl-Fredrik Westin
Journal:  Front Phys       Date:  2018-03-02

9.  Effects of MRI Protocol Parameters, Preload Injection Dose, Fractionation Strategies, and Leakage Correction Algorithms on the Fidelity of Dynamic-Susceptibility Contrast MRI Estimates of Relative Cerebral Blood Volume in Gliomas.

Authors:  K Leu; J L Boxerman; B M Ellingson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  The impact of vessel size, orientation and intravascular contribution on the neurovascular fingerprint of BOLD bSSFP fMRI.

Authors:  Mario Gilberto Báez-Yánez; Philipp Ehses; Christian Mirkes; Philbert S Tsai; David Kleinfeld; Klaus Scheffler
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.