Literature DB >> 31400035

Systematic assessment of multi-echo dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI using a digital reference object.

Ashley M Stokes1, Natenael B Semmineh1, Ashley Nespodzany1, Laura C Bell1, C Chad Quarles1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Brain tumor dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI is adversely impacted by T1 and T 2 ∗ contrast agent leakage effects that result in inaccurate hemodynamic metrics. While multi-echo acquisitions remove T1 leakage effects, there is no consensus on the optimal set of acquisition parameters. Using a computational approach, we systematically evaluated a wide range of acquisition strategies to determine the optimal multi-echo DSC-MRI perfusion protocol.
METHODS: Using a population-based DSC-MRI digital reference object (DRO), we assessed the influence of preload dosing (no preload and full dose preload), field strength (1.5 and 3T), pulse sequence parameters (echo time, repetition time, and flip angle), and leakage correction on relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and flow (rCBF) accuracy. We also compared multi-echo DSC-MRI protocols with standard single-echo protocols.
RESULTS: Multi-echo DSC-MRI is highly consistent across all protocols, and multi-echo rCBV (with or without use of a preload dose) had higher accuracy than single-echo rCBV. Regression analysis showed that choice of repetition time and flip angle had minimal impact on multi-echo rCBV and rCBV, indicating the potential for significant flexibility in acquisition parameters. The echo time combination had minimal impact on rCBV, though longer echo times should be avoided, particularly at higher field strengths. Leakage correction improved rCBV accuracy in all cases. Multi-echo rCBF was less biased than single-echo rCBF, although rCBF accuracy was reduced overall relative to rCBV.
CONCLUSIONS: Multi-echo acquisitions were more robust than single-echo, essentially decoupling both repetition time and flip angle from rCBV accuracy. Multi-echo acquisitions obviate the need for preload dosing, although leakage correction to remove residual T 2 ∗ leakage effects remains compulsory for high rCBV accuracy.
© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain tumor hemodynamics; digital reference object (DRO); dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC); multi-echo; perfusion

Year:  2019        PMID: 31400035      PMCID: PMC6778704          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  41 in total

1.  Percentage signal recovery derived from MR dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging is useful to differentiate common enhancing malignant lesions of the brain.

Authors:  R Mangla; B Kolar; T Zhu; J Zhong; J Almast; S Ekholm
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  The 39 steps: evading error and deciphering the secrets for accurate dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.

Authors:  Lisa Willats; Fernando Calamante
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  A fully automated method for quantitative cerebral hemodynamic analysis using DSC-MRI.

Authors:  Atle Bjørnerud; Kyrre E Emblem
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  Comparison of dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR methods: recommendations for measuring relative cerebral blood volume in brain tumors.

Authors:  Eric S Paulson; Kathleen M Schmainda
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Regional blood flow, capillary permeability, and compartmental volumes: measurement with dynamic CT--initial experience.

Authors:  G Brix; M L Bahner; U Hoffmann; A Horvath; W Schreiber
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Simultaneous perfusion and permeability measurements using combined spin- and gradient-echo MRI.

Authors:  Heiko Schmiedeskamp; Jalal B Andre; Matus Straka; Thomas Christen; Seema Nagpal; Lawrence Recht; Reena P Thomas; Greg Zaharchuk; Roland Bammer
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 6.200

7.  MR contrast due to intravascular magnetic susceptibility perturbations.

Authors:  J L Boxerman; L M Hamberg; B R Rosen; R M Weisskoff
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  The Role of preload and leakage correction in gadolinium-based cerebral blood volume estimation determined by comparison with MION as a criterion standard.

Authors:  J L Boxerman; D E Prah; E S Paulson; J T Machan; D Bedekar; K M Schmainda
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Perfusion mapping with multiecho multishot parallel imaging EPI.

Authors:  Rexford D Newbould; Stefan T Skare; Thies H Jochimsen; Marcus T Alley; Michael E Moseley; Gregory W Albers; Roland Bammer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.737

10.  An efficient computational approach to characterize DSC-MRI signals arising from three-dimensional heterogeneous tissue structures.

Authors:  Natenael B Semmineh; Junzhong Xu; Jerrold L Boxerman; Gary W Delaney; Paul W Cleary; John C Gore; C Chad Quarles
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of single bolus, dual-echo dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI protocols in brain tumor patients.

Authors:  Ashley M Stokes; Maurizio Bergamino; Lea Alhilali; Leland S Hu; John P Karis; Leslie C Baxter; Laura C Bell; C Chad Quarles
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 6.960

Review 2.  Aquaporins Are One of the Critical Factors in the Disruption of the Skin Barrier in Inflammatory Skin Diseases.

Authors:  Paola Maura Tricarico; Donatella Mentino; Aurora De Marco; Cecilia Del Vecchio; Sabino Garra; Gerardo Cazzato; Caterina Foti; Sergio Crovella; Giuseppe Calamita
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 5.923

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.