Literature DB >> 1830688

Identifying patients at risk of becoming disabled because of low-back pain. The Vermont Rehabilitation Engineering Center predictive model.

W L Cats-Baril1, J W Frymoyer.   

Abstract

A predictive risk model of low-back pain (LBP) disability was developed by a panel of six experts in the fields of chronic pain and disability. It comprised 28 factors organized into eight categories: job, psychosocial, injury, diagnostic, demographic, medical history, health behaviors, and anthropometric characteristics and was administered as a 15-minute written questionnaire. The model was tested prospectively on 250 patients (age range, 18-65 years) attending two secondary-care low-back clinics. Disability, as predicted by the model, was compared with 1) actual disability assessed 3 and 6 months later; 2) predictions of disability made by the attending physicians; and 3) predictions obtained from an empirically derived model. These results showed that 1) the expert-generated risk model had a predictive accuracy of 89% and did better in predicting disability than the physicians across all samples and 2) the empirically weighted model did best of all (91% predictive accuracy), suggesting that the expert model used appropriate factors but that the weights assigned to these factors by the panel of experts could be improved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1830688     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199106000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  24 in total

Review 1.  Occupational psychological factors increase the risk for back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  S J Linton
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2001-03

2.  Early prognostic factors for duration on temporary total benefits in the first year among workers with compensated occupational soft tissue injuries.

Authors:  S Hogg-Johnson; D C Cole
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 3.  [Patients with low back pain. Psychosocial work-related factors and return to work - a literature review].

Authors:  M Bethge
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Inhibition of vertebral endplate perfusion results in decreased intervertebral disc intranuclear diffusive transport.

Authors:  Marije van der Werf; Patrick Lezuo; Otto Maissen; Corrinus C van Donkelaar; Keita Ito
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-10-20       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  The reliability and validity of a measure of perceived functional capacity for work in chronic back pain.

Authors:  L Gibson; J Strong
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1996-09

6.  Screening for patients at risk of developing chronic incapacity.

Authors:  C J Main; P J Watson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1995-12

7.  Patients' perceptions of health related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis and chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Montserrat Núñez; Alex Sanchez; Esther Nuñez; Teresa Casals; Cayetano Alegre; José Muñoz-Gomez
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into nucleus pulposus cells in vitro.

Authors:  Fenghua Tao; Feng Li; Guanghui Li; Feng Pan
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2008-05-15

9.  Prognostic factors for musculoskeletal sickness absence and return to work among welders and metal workers.

Authors:  A Burdorf; B Naaktgeboren; W Post
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  The effect of cigarette smoking on musculoskeletal-related disability.

Authors:  Andrew E Lincoln; Gordon S Smith; Paul J Amoroso; Nicole S Bell
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.