Reproducibility of mass spectrometry based protein profiles for diagnosis of breast cancer across clinical studies: a systematic review.

Serum protein profiling by mass spectrometry has achieved attention as a promising technology in oncoproteomics. We performed a systematic review of published reports on protein profiling as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE databases were searched for original studies reporting discriminatory protein peaks for breast cancer as either protein identity or as m/ z values in the period from January 1995 to October 2006. To address the important aspect of reproducibility of mass spectrometry data across different clinical studies, we compared the published lists of potential discriminatory peaks with those peaks detected in an original MALDI MS protein profiling study performed by our own research group. A total of 20 protein/peptide profiling studies were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review. Only 3 reports included information on protein identity. Although the studies revealed a considerable heterogeneity in relation to experimental design, biological variation, preanalytical conditions, methods of computational data analysis, and analytical reproducibility of profiles, we found that 45% of peaks previously reported to correlate with breast cancer were also detected in our experimental study. Furthermore, 25% of these redetected peaks also showed a significant difference between cases and controls in our study. Thus, despite known problems related to reproducibility, we were able to demonstrate overlap in peaks between clinical studies indicating some convergence toward a set of common discriminating, reproducible peaks for breast cancer. These peaks should be further characterized for identification of the protein identity and validated as biomarkers for breast cancer.