Literature DB >> 18302507

Assessment of the 10-year probability of osteoporotic hip fracture combining clinical risk factors and heel bone ultrasound: the EPISEM prospective cohort of 12,958 elderly women.

Didier Hans1, Claire Durosier, John A Kanis, Helena Johansson, Anne-Marie Schott-Pethelaz, Marc-Antoine Krieg.   

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a hip screening tool that combines relevant clinical risk factors (CRFs) and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) at the heel to determine the 10-yr probability of hip fractures in elderly women. The EPISEM database, comprised of approximately 13,000 women 70 yr of age, was derived from two population-based white European cohorts in France and Switzerland. All women had baseline data on CRFs and a baseline measurement of the stiffness index (SI) derived from QUS at the heel. Women were followed prospectively to identify incident fractures. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the CRFs that contributed significantly to hip fracture risk, and these were used to generate a CRF score. Gradients of risk (GR; RR/SD change) and areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were calculated for the CRF score, SI, and a score combining both. The 10-yr probability of hip fracture was computed for the combined model. Three hundred seven hip fractures were observed over a mean follow-up of 3.2 yr. In addition to SI, significant CRFs for hip fracture were body mass index (BMI), history of fracture, an impaired chair test, history of a recent fall, current cigarette smoking, and diabetes mellitus. The average GR for hip fracture was 2.10 per SD with the combined SI + CRF score compared with a GR of 1.77 with SI alone and of 1.52 with the CRF score alone. Thus, the use of CRFs enhanced the predictive value of SI alone. For example, in a woman 80 yr of age, the presence of two to four CRFs increased the probability of hip fracture from 16.9% to 26.6% and from 52.6% to 70.5% for SI Z-scores of +2 and -3, respectively. The combined use of CRFs and QUS SI is a promising tool to assess hip fracture probability in elderly women, especially when access to DXA is limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18302507     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.080229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  20 in total

1.  Fracture predictive ability of physical performance tests and history of falls in elderly women: a 10-year prospective study.

Authors:  A Wihlborg; M Englund; K Åkesson; P Gerdhem
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Fall-related risk factors and heel quantitative ultrasound in the assessment of hip fracture risk: a 10-year follow-up of a nationally representative adult population sample.

Authors:  M Kauppi; S Stenholm; O Impivaara; J Mäki; M Heliövaara; A Jula
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Chantal M J de Bakker; Wei-Ju Tseng; Yihan Li; Hongbo Zhao; X Sherry Liu
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Quantitative ultrasound of the heel and fracture risk assessment: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Moayyeri; J E Adams; R A Adler; M-A Krieg; D Hans; J Compston; E M Lewiecki
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Osteoprotegerin and uremic osteoporosis in chronic hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Diana Moldovan; Crina Rusu; Alina Potra; Ioan Moldovan; Ioan Mihai Patiu; Mirela Gherman-Caprioara; Ina Maria Kacso
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Calcaneal BMD Obtained by Dual X-Ray and Laser Predicts Future Hip Fractures-A Prospective Study on 4 398 Swedish Women.

Authors:  Torkel B Brismar; Imre Janszky; L I M Toft
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2010-06-10

7.  Quantitative ultrasound measurements and vitamin D status in the assessment of hip fracture risk in a nationally representative population sample.

Authors:  M Kauppi; O Impivaara; J Mäki; M Heliövaara; A Jula
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Performance of risk assessment instruments for predicting osteoporotic fracture risk: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Nayak; D L Edwards; A A Saleh; S L Greenspan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Remaining lifetime and absolute 10-year probabilities of osteoporotic fracture in Swiss men and women.

Authors:  K Lippuner; H Johansson; J A Kanis; R Rizzoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Multisite quantitative ultrasound for the prediction of fractures over 5 years of follow-up: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  Wojciech P Olszynski; Jacques P Brown; Jonathan D Adachi; David A Hanley; George Ioannidis; Kenneth S Davison
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.