Literature DB >> 23595563

Quantitative ultrasound measurements and vitamin D status in the assessment of hip fracture risk in a nationally representative population sample.

M Kauppi1, O Impivaara, J Mäki, M Heliövaara, A Jula.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: Adjusted for age, gender, height and weight, calcaneal quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (S-25(OH)D) proved to be significant predictors of hip fracture among subjects aged ≥50 years. Even if their contribution to the predictive power was modest, they may be useful in the assessment of hip fracture risk in the elderly.
INTRODUCTION: This study assessed calcaneal QUS measurements, S-25(OH)D and several other factors for the prediction of hip fracture risk in a nationally representative population sample.
METHODS: The study population consisted of 3,305 subjects (1,872 women), aged 50 years or over, who had participated in a comprehensive health survey. QUS measurements were made by means of the Hologic Sahara device. S-25(OH)D was measured by radioimmunoassay. Emerging cases of hip fracture were identified from the National Hospital Discharge Register.
RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 8.4 years, 95 subjects sustained a hip fracture. After adjusting for age, gender, height, weight and each other, a 1 standard deviation increment in the quantitative ultrasound index (QUI) (21.7) and in S-25(OH)D (17.5 nmol/L) reduced the risk of hip fracture by 40 % (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.60, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 0.42-0.86) and by 31 % (HR = 0.69, 95 % CI = 0.55-0.87), respectively. The predictive power of a model including age, gender, height and weight was improved by about 8 % after the addition of QUI and S-25(OH)D. Among subjects aged 75 years or over, the corresponding improvement was about 130 %.
CONCLUSIONS: QUI and S-25(OH)D were significant and independent predictors of hip fracture. However, their ability to increase the predictive power of a statistical model including readily available simple variables such as age, gender, height and weight was rather modest. Still, our findings suggest that QUI and S-25(OH)D may be of clinical use in the assessment of hip fracture risk particularly in the elderly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23595563     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-013-2355-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  39 in total

1.  Prediction of hip fracture risk by quantitative ultrasound in more than 7000 Swiss women > or =70 years of age: comparison of three technologically different bone ultrasound devices in the SEMOF study.

Authors:  Marc-Antoine Krieg; Jacques Cornuz; Christiane Ruffieux; Guy Van Melle; Daniel Büche; Maximilian A Dambacher; Didier Hans; Florian Hartl; Hansjorg J Häuselmann; Marius Kraenzlin; Kurt Lippuner; Maurus Neff; Pierro Pancaldi; Rene Rizzoli; Franco Tanzi; Robert Theiler; Alan Tyndall; Claus Wimpfheimer; Peter Burckhardt
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Comparing properties of audit data and routinely collected register data in case of performance assessment of hip fracture treatment in Finland.

Authors:  R Sund; I Nurmi-Lüthje; P Lüthje; S Tanninen; A Narinen; I Keskimäki
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.176

3.  Half of the patients with an acute hip fracture suffer from hypovitaminosis D: a prospective study in southeastern Finland.

Authors:  Ilona Nurmi; Juha-Pekka Kaukonen; Peter Lüthje; Helena Naboulsi; Salla Tanninen; Matti Kataja; Maija-Leena Kallio; Marjatta Leppilampi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Comparison of six calcaneal quantitative ultrasound devices: precision and hip fracture discrimination.

Authors:  C F Njeh; D Hans; J Li; B Fan; T Fuerst; Y Q He; E Tsuda-Futami; Y Lu; C Y Wu; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Prediction of absolute risk of non-spinal fractures using clinical risk factors and heel quantitative ultrasound.

Authors:  A Díez-Pérez; J González-Macías; F Marín; M Abizanda; R Alvarez; A Gimeno; E Pegenaute; J Vila
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Mortality after osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  O Johnell; J A Kanis; A Odén; I Sernbo; I Redlund-Johnell; C Petterson; C De Laet; B Jönsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-10-30       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Vitamin D status and common risk factors for bone fragility as determinants of quantitative ultrasound variables in a nationally representative population sample.

Authors:  Maarit Kauppi; Olli Impivaara; Juhani Mäki; Markku Heliövaara; Jukka Marniemi; Jukka Montonen; Antti Jula
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Prediction of fracture risk in men: a cohort study.

Authors:  Liisa Byberg; Rolf Gedeborg; Thomas Cars; Johan Sundström; Lars Berglund; Lena Kilander; Håkan Melhus; Karl Michaëlsson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Quantitative ultrasound predicts hip and non-spine fracture in men: the MrOS study.

Authors:  D C Bauer; S K Ewing; J A Cauley; K E Ensrud; S R Cummings; E S Orwoll
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 5.071

View more
  7 in total

1.  Fall-related risk factors and heel quantitative ultrasound in the assessment of hip fracture risk: a 10-year follow-up of a nationally representative adult population sample.

Authors:  M Kauppi; S Stenholm; O Impivaara; J Mäki; M Heliövaara; A Jula
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  The relationship between serum vitamin D and fracture risk in the elderly: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ning Wang; Yungang Chen; Jindou Ji; Jinlei Chang; Shengwen Yu; Bo Yu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 3.  Advances in imaging approaches to fracture risk evaluation.

Authors:  Mary Kate Manhard; Jeffry S Nyman; Mark D Does
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 7.012

4.  The associations between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and the risk of total fracture and hip fracture.

Authors:  Y Feng; G Cheng; H Wang; B Chen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Relationship between serum vitamin D and hip fracture in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shahrzad Habibi Ghahfarrokhi; Abdollah Mohammadian-Hafshejani; Catherine M T Sherwin; Saeid Heidari-Soureshjani
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Diagnostic value of osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians (OSTA) and quantitative bone ultrasound (QUS) in detecting high-risk populations for osteoporosis among elderly Chinese men.

Authors:  Xiao-Yun Zha; Yu Hu; Xiao-Na Pang; Gui-Lin Chang; Li Li
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Undiagnosed vertebral fractures influence quality of life in postmenopausal women with reduced ultrasound parameters.

Authors:  Ranuccio Nuti; Carla Caffarelli; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Luigi Gennari; Stefano Gonnelli
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 4.176

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.