Literature DB >> 15942702

Fracture Reduction Affects Medicare Economics (FRAME): impact of increased osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment.

Alison B King1, K G Saag, R T Burge, M Pisu, N Goel.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a common, debilitating disease affecting US Medicare beneficiaries, yet diagnosis and treatment lag behind medical advances. We estimated the cost of fractures to the Medicare program and the impact of increasing osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment. A Markov model was used to predict fracture incidence and costs in postmenopausal women aged 65 years and older, over 3 years (2001-2003). Only 1.80 million women were estimated to receive a Medicare-reimbursed bone mineral density (BMD) test in 2001. We evaluated the budget impact of testing an additional 1 million women from Medicare and patient perspectives. These women were stratified into high-risk (osteoporotic with prevalent vertebral fracture) and moderate-risk (without prevalent vertebral fracture) groups. During 2001-2003, an estimated 2.39 million fractures occurred among the 5.11 million women aged 65+ with osteoporosis, at a cost to Medicare of 12.96 billion dollars. We projected that BMD testing of an additional 1 million women in 2001 would result in treatment of 440,000 new patients with a bone-specific medication, preventing over 35,000 fractures over the 3 years. The decrease in fractures would produce a net discounted savings to the Medicare budget of 77.86 million dollars. Medicare's hospital inpatient cost would decrease by 115.41 million dollars and long-term care cost by 43.51 million dollars, more than offsetting incremental outpatient cost of 81.07 million dollars. Patients would benefit from fracture avoidance, but their out-of-pocket medical costs would increase by 63.49 million dollars during 2001-2003, or 1,771 dollars per fracture avoided. Sensitivity analyses showed that savings to the Medicare program varied in proportion to the unit cost of fractures, fracture risk of the populations tested, treatment rate, and adherence to therapy. Increased osteoporosis diagnosis may produce savings for the Medicare program if interventions are targeted to women at elevated risk for fracture and may be budget neutral if all older women are screened.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15942702     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-1869-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  40 in total

Review 1.  Osteoporosis: review of the evidence for prevention, diagnosis and treatment and cost-effectiveness analysis. Introduction.

Authors: 
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  A framework for cost-sharing policy analysis.

Authors:  R J Rubin; D N Mendelson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  A randomized trial of nasal spray salmon calcitonin in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis: the prevent recurrence of osteoporotic fractures study. PROOF Study Group.

Authors:  C H Chesnut; S Silverman; K Andriano; H Genant; A Gimona; S Harris; D Kiel; M LeBoff; M Maricic; P Miller; C Moniz; M Peacock; P Richardson; N Watts; D Baylink
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women.

Authors:  L J Melton; S H Kan; M A Frye; H W Wahner; W M O'Fallon; B L Riggs
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Low-molecular-weight heparins compared with unfractionated heparin for treatment of acute deep venous thrombosis. A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  M K Gould; A D Dembitzer; G D Sanders; A M Garber
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-05-18       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Healthcare use among U.S. women aged 45 and older: total costs and costs for selected postmenopausal health risks.

Authors:  T J Hoerger; K E Downs; M C Lakshmanan; R C Lindrooth; L Plouffe; B Wendling; S L West; R L Ohsfeldt
Journal:  J Womens Health Gend Based Med       Date:  1999-10

7.  Effects of risedronate treatment on vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. Vertebral Efficacy With Risedronate Therapy (VERT) Study Group.

Authors:  S T Harris; N B Watts; H K Genant; C D McKeever; T Hangartner; M Keller; C H Chesnut; J Brown; E F Eriksen; M S Hoseyni; D W Axelrod; P D Miller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-13       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting.

Authors:  S H Gehlbach; C Bigelow; M Heimisdottir; S May; M Walker; J R Kirkwood
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators.

Authors:  B Ettinger; D M Black; B H Mitlak; R K Knickerbocker; T Nickelsen; H K Genant; C Christiansen; P D Delmas; J R Zanchetta; J Stakkestad; C C Glüer; K Krueger; F J Cohen; S Eckert; K E Ensrud; L V Avioli; P Lips; S R Cummings
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  BMD at multiple sites and risk of fracture of multiple types: long-term results from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures.

Authors:  Katie L Stone; Dana G Seeley; Li-Yung Lui; Jane A Cauley; Kristine Ensrud; Warren S Browner; Michael C Nevitt; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Osteoporotic fractures in Asia: risk factors and strategies for prevention.

Authors:  Jian-min Liu; Guang Ning; Jia-lun Chen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Effect of self-referral on bone mineral density testing and osteoporosis treatment.

Authors:  Amy H Warriner; Ryan C Outman; Adrianne C Feldstein; Douglas W Roblin; Jeroan J Allison; Jeffrey R Curtis; David T Redden; Mary M Rix; Brandi E Robinson; Ana G Rosales; Monika M Safford; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Vertebroplasty with self-locking hexagonal metal implants shows comparable primary and secondary stiffness to PMMA cement augmentation techniques in a biomechanical vertebral compression fracture model.

Authors:  W Schmoelz; A C Disch; J F Huber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Direct and indirect costs of non-vertebral fracture patients with osteoporosis in the US.

Authors:  Crystal Pike; Howard G Birnbaum; Matt Schiller; Hari Sharma; Russel Burge; Eric T Edgell
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Effect of Medicare reimbursement reduction for imaging services on osteoporosis screening rates.

Authors:  Carrie McAdam-Marx; Sudhir Unni; Xiangyang Ye; Scott Nelson; Nancy A Nickman
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 6.  Osteoporosis therapies: evidence from health-care databases and observational population studies.

Authors:  Stuart L Silverman
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Cost-effective osteoporosis treatment thresholds: the United States perspective.

Authors:  A N A Tosteson; L J Melton; B Dawson-Hughes; S Baim; M J Favus; S Khosla; R L Lindsay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Longitudinal trends in use of bone mass measurement among older americans, 1999-2005.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Curtis; Laura Carbone; Hong Cheng; Burton Hayes; Andrew Laster; Robert Matthews; Kenneth G Saag; Robert Sepanski; Simpson B Tanner; Elizabeth Delzell
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Access to oral osteoporosis drugs among female Medicare Part D beneficiaries.

Authors:  Chia-Wei Lin; Pinar Karaca-Mandic; Jeffrey S McCullough; Lesley Weaver
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2014-05-14

Review 10.  Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in the older senior.

Authors:  Sheryl F Vondracek; Sunny A Linnebur
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.