Literature DB >> 18301285

New ways to measure intraocular pressure.

Mohammed K ElMallah1, Sanjay G Asrani.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In the last 10 years, several new means to measure intraocular pressure have emerged. This review covers recent findings concerning four new technologies: the ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour tonometry, rebound tonometry and the Proview phosphene tonometer. RECENT
FINDINGS: The ocular response analyzer provides measurements of corneal biomechanics, including corneal hysteresis. Intraocular pressure readings from the ocular response analyzer have correlated well with Goldmann applanation tonometry and seem to be independent of corneal thickness in nonglaucoma patients; however, further studies are needed to determine whether this is true in glaucoma patients. Dynamic contour tonometry also appears to give pressure readings that are independent of corneal thickness. Rebound tonometry is convenient, can be used without topical anesthesia and appears to correlate well with Goldmann tonometry; however, pressure readings from rebound tonometry are not independent of corneal properties. Use of the Proview phosphene tonometer appears to decrease patient anxiety regarding their glaucoma; however, studies have not been supportive of its accuracy.
SUMMARY: Dynamic contour tonometry provides intraocular pressure readings that are less dependent on corneal properties than Goldmann applanation tonometry. Rebound tonometry appears to correlate well with Goldmann tonometry and can be used without topical anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18301285     DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3282f391ae

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1040-8738            Impact factor:   3.761


  23 in total

1.  [Effect of applanation tonometry on precision of biometry measurements].

Authors:  T M Rabsilber; S Bueltmann; M P Holzer; G U Auffarth
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Evaluation of the Icare-ONE rebound tonometer as a self-measuring intraocular pressure device in normal subjects.

Authors:  Ioannis Halkiadakis; Aimilianos Stratos; George Stergiopoulos; Eleni Patsea; Sotiris Skouriotis; Panagiotis Mitropoulos; Dimitrios Papaconstantinou; Gerasimos Georgopoulos
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Intravitreal silicone oil induced changes in corneal biomechanics.

Authors:  Mehmet Y Teke; Ufuk Elgin; Emine Sen; Pinar Ozdal; Faruk Ozturk
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Fatih Özcura; Nilgün Yildirim; Afsun Şahin; Ertuğrul Çolak
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  [Intra-ocular pressure during and after playing high and low resistance wind instruments].

Authors:  K Kappmeyer; I M Lanzl
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  The influence of refractive errors on IOP measurement by rebound tonometry (ICare) and Goldmann applanation tonometry.

Authors:  Teresio Avitabile; Antonio Longo; Daniela Rocca; Roberta Amato; Caterina Gagliano; Marine Castaing
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Impact of corneal parameters on intraocular pressure measurements in different tonometry methods.

Authors:  Aleksandra Zakrzewska; Marta P Wiącek; Anna Machalińska
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  Does patient comfort influence the choice of tonometer for the measurement of intraocular pressure?

Authors:  Mary O Ugalahi; Mukaila A Seidu; Bolutife A Olusanya; Aderonke M Baiyeroju
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Corneal biomechanical properties measured by the ocular response analyzer in acromegalic patients.

Authors:  Emine Sen; Yasemin Tutuncu; Melike Balikoglu-Yilmaz; Ufuk Elgin; Dilek Berker; Faruk Ozturk; Serdar Guler
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Comparison of Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry in a population of Mexican open-angle glaucoma patients.

Authors:  J Jimenez-Roman; F Gil-Carrasco; A Martinez; O Albis-Donado; J D De la Torre-Tovar
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 2.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.