BACKGROUND: The reliability of biomarkers profoundly impacts validity of their use in epidemiology and can have serious implications for study power and the ability to find true associations. We assessed reliability of plasma carotenoid levels over time and how it could influence study power through sample size and effect-size. METHODS: Plasma carotenoid levels were measured in a cohort study of 1323 women participating in the control arm of the Women's Healthy Eating and Living Study. We compared mean plasma levels at baseline, year 1, and year 4 of the study for alpha-carotene, beta-carotene, lycopene, lutein, and beta-cryptoxanthin. Reliability of these levels over time was assessed by Spearman correlations and intraclass correlation. RESULTS: We found limited variation in mean levels between any 2 time points. Variation did not exceed 8% for lycopene, lutein, and beta-cryptoxanthin, 15% for alpha-carotene, and 18% for beta-carotene. Spearman correlations for individual carotenoids over time varied between 0.50 and 0.80, with lycopene having the lowest correlation. Intraclass correlations ranged from 0.47 to 0.66 for carotenoids. CONCLUSION: Intraclass correlations for plasma carotenoids over a period of several years are acceptable for epidemiologic studies. However, such variation is enough to decrease statistical power and increase the sample size needed to detect a given effect.
BACKGROUND: The reliability of biomarkers profoundly impacts validity of their use in epidemiology and can have serious implications for study power and the ability to find true associations. We assessed reliability of plasma carotenoid levels over time and how it could influence study power through sample size and effect-size. METHODS: Plasma carotenoid levels were measured in a cohort study of 1323 women participating in the control arm of the Women's Healthy Eating and Living Study. We compared mean plasma levels at baseline, year 1, and year 4 of the study for alpha-carotene, beta-carotene, lycopene, lutein, and beta-cryptoxanthin. Reliability of these levels over time was assessed by Spearman correlations and intraclass correlation. RESULTS: We found limited variation in mean levels between any 2 time points. Variation did not exceed 8% for lycopene, lutein, and beta-cryptoxanthin, 15% for alpha-carotene, and 18% for beta-carotene. Spearman correlations for individual carotenoids over time varied between 0.50 and 0.80, with lycopene having the lowest correlation. Intraclass correlations ranged from 0.47 to 0.66 for carotenoids. CONCLUSION: Intraclass correlations for plasma carotenoids over a period of several years are acceptable for epidemiologic studies. However, such variation is enough to decrease statistical power and increase the sample size needed to detect a given effect.
Authors: G W Comstock; A E Burke; S C Hoffman; E P Norkus; M Gross; K J Helzlsouer Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: John P Pierce; Vicky A Newman; Shirley W Flatt; Susan Faerber; Cheryl L Rock; Loki Natarajan; Bette J Caan; Ellen B Gold; Kathryn A Hollenbach; Linda Wasserman; Lovell Jones; Cheryl Ritenbaugh; Marcia L Stefanick; Cynthia A Thomson; Sheila Kealey Journal: J Nutr Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: John P Pierce; Susan Faerber; Fred A Wright; Cheryl L Rock; Vicky Newman; Shirley W Flatt; Sheila Kealey; Vicky E Jones; Bette J Caan; Ellen B Gold; Mary Haan; Kathryn A Hollenbach; Lovell Jones; James R Marshall; Cheryl Ritenbaugh; Marcia L Stefanick; Cynthia Thomson; Linda Wasserman; Loki Natarajan; Ronald G Thomas; Elizabeth A Gilpin Journal: Control Clin Trials Date: 2002-12
Authors: Joanne Kotsopoulos; Shelley S Tworoger; Hannia Campos; Fung-Lung Chung; Charles V Clevenger; Adrian A Franke; Christos S Mantzoros; Vincent Ricchiuti; Walter C Willett; Susan E Hankinson; A Heather Eliassen Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-03-23 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Nicholas J Ollberding; Gertraud Maskarinec; Shannon M Conroy; Yukiko Morimoto; Adrian A Franke; Robert V Cooney; Lynne R Wilkens; Loïc Le Marchand; Marc T Goodman; Brenda Y Hernandez; Brian E Henderson; Laurence N Kolonel Journal: Blood Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Nasira M Burkholder-Cooley; Sujatha S Rajaram; Ella H Haddad; Keiji Oda; Gary E Fraser; Karen Jaceldo-Siegl Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Amber S Kleckner; Edwin van Wijngaarden; Todd A Jusko; Ian R Kleckner; Po-Ju Lin; Karen M Mustian; Luke J Peppone Journal: Cancer Res Commun Date: 2022-03-31
Authors: Mary K Townsend; Clary B Clish; Peter Kraft; Chen Wu; Amanda L Souza; Amy A Deik; Shelley S Tworoger; Brian M Wolpin Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2013-07-29 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Gary E Fraser; Karen Jaceldo-Siegl; Susanne M Henning; Jing Fan; Synnove F Knutsen; Ella H Haddad; Joan Sabaté; W Lawrence Beeson; Hannelore Bennett Journal: J Nutr Date: 2016-02-03 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Tobias Nordström; Erin L Van Blarigan; Vy Ngo; Ritu Roy; Vivian Weinberg; Xiaoling Song; Jeffry Simko; Peter R Carroll; June M Chan; Pamela L Paris Journal: Prostate Date: 2015-11-20 Impact factor: 4.104