Literature DB >> 2807678

A review of the effects of random measurement error on relative risk estimates in epidemiological studies.

N H de Klerk1, D R English, B K Armstrong.   

Abstract

Many articles in the recent epidemiological literature have discussed the effects of random error and misclassification on effect estimation, but many of these have been unclear and hard to follow. This paper reviews and interprets many of these and summarizes the use of the correlation coefficient in assessing the likely effect of measurement error on relative risk estimates for variables that are either continuous or ordered. A table of expected values of relative risks (RRs) calculated in different ways for different levels of random error is presented and the typically large expected attenuation in RR values is shown. The recommendation of taking repeated or multiple measurements whenever possible is endorsed.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2807678     DOI: 10.1093/ije/18.3.705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  20 in total

1.  Circulating anti-Müllerian hormone and breast cancer risk: A study in ten prospective cohorts.

Authors:  Wenzhen Ge; Tess V Clendenen; Yelena Afanasyeva; Karen L Koenig; Claudia Agnoli; Louise A Brinton; Joanne F Dorgan; A Heather Eliassen; Roni T Falk; Göran Hallmans; Susan E Hankinson; Judith Hoffman-Bolton; Timothy J Key; Vittorio Krogh; Hazel B Nichols; Dale P Sandler; Minouk J Schoemaker; Patrick M Sluss; Malin Sund; Anthony J Swerdlow; Kala Visvanathan; Mengling Liu; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 2.  Effect of measurement error on epidemiological studies of environmental and occupational exposures.

Authors:  B G Armstrong
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Differential accuracy of physical activity self-report by body mass index.

Authors:  Erica T Warner; Kathleen Y Wolin; Dustin T Duncan; Daniel P Heil; Sandy Askew; Gary G Bennett
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2012-03

Review 4.  New Methods for Personal Exposure Monitoring for Airborne Particles.

Authors:  Kirsten A Koehler; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2015-12

5.  Silica, compensated silicosis, and lung cancer in Western Australian goldminers.

Authors:  N H de Klerk; A W Musk
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Reproducibility of serum pituitary hormones in women.

Authors:  Alan A Arslan; Yian Gu; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Karen L Koenig; Mengling Liu; Lyudmila Velikokhatnaya; Roy E Shore; Paolo Toniolo; Faina Linkov; Anna E Lokshin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  An analysis of the reliability of self reported work histories from a cohort of workers exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls.

Authors:  C R Rosenberg
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1993-09

8.  The issue of confounding in epidemiological studies of ambient air pollution and pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  M J Strickland; M Klein; L A Darrow; W D Flanders; A Correa; M Marcus; P E Tolbert
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Reliability of plasma carotenoid biomarkers and its relation to study power.

Authors:  Wael K Al-Delaimy; Loki Natarajan; Xiaoying Sun; Cheryl L Rock; John P Pierce; John J Pierce
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.822

10.  Estimation of exposure to atmospheric pollutants during pregnancy integrating space-time activity and indoor air levels: Does it make a difference?

Authors:  Marion Ouidir; Lise Giorgis-Allemand; Sarah Lyon-Caen; Xavier Morelli; Claire Cracowski; Sabrina Pontet; Isabelle Pin; Johanna Lepeule; Valérie Siroux; Rémy Slama
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 9.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.