Literature DB >> 18298193

An efficient probabilistic methodology for incorporating uncertainty in body segment parameters and anatomical landmarks in joint loadings estimated from inverse dynamics.

Joseph E Langenderfer1, Peter J Laz, Anthony J Petrella, Paul J Rullkoetter.   

Abstract

Inverse dynamics is a standard approach for estimating joint loadings in the lower extremity from kinematic and ground reaction data for use in clinical and research gait studies. Variability in estimating body segment parameters and uncertainty in defining anatomical landmarks have the potential to impact predicted joint loading. This study demonstrates the application of efficient probabilistic methods to quantify the effect of uncertainty in these parameters and landmarks on joint loading in an inverse-dynamics model, and identifies the relative importance of the parameters and landmarks to the predicted joint loading. The inverse-dynamics analysis used a benchmark data set of lower-extremity kinematics and ground reaction data during the stance phase of gait to predict the three-dimensional intersegmental forces and moments. The probabilistic analysis predicted the 1-99 percentile ranges of intersegmental forces and moments at the hip, knee, and ankle. Variabilities, in forces and moments of up to 56% and 156% of the mean values were predicted based on coefficients of variation less than 0.20 for the body segment parameters and standard deviations of 2 mm for the anatomical landmarks. Sensitivity factors identified the important parameters for the specific joint and component directions. Anatomical landmarks affected moments to a larger extent than body segment parameters. Additionally, for forces, anatomical landmarks had a larger effect than body segment parameters, with the exception of segment masses, which were important to the proximal-distal joint forces. The probabilistic modeling approach predicted the range of possible joint loading, which has implications in gait studies, clinical assessments, and implant design evaluations.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18298193     DOI: 10.1115/1.2838037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  12 in total

1.  Prediction of In Vivo Knee Joint Loads Using a Global Probabilistic Analysis.

Authors:  Alessandro Navacchia; Casey A Myers; Paul J Rullkoetter; Kevin B Shelburne
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Simulated hip abductor strengthening reduces peak joint contact forces in patients with total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Casey A Myers; Peter J Laz; Kevin B Shelburne; Dana L Judd; Joshua D Winters; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley; Bradley S Davidson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Global sensitivity analysis of the joint kinematics during gait to the parameters of a lower limb multi-body model.

Authors:  Aimad El Habachi; Florent Moissenet; Sonia Duprey; Laurence Cheze; Raphaël Dumas
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  A probabilistic approach to quantify the impact of uncertainty propagation in musculoskeletal simulations.

Authors:  Casey A Myers; Peter J Laz; Kevin B Shelburne; Bradley S Davidson
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 5.  Methodological factors affecting joint moments estimation in clinical gait analysis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Valentina Camomilla; Andrea Cereatti; Andrea Giovanni Cutti; Silvia Fantozzi; Rita Stagni; Giuseppe Vannozzi
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Adaptive surrogate modeling for expedited estimation of nonlinear tissue properties through inverse finite element analysis.

Authors:  Jason P Halloran; Ahmet Erdemir
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Design of Optimal Treatments for Neuromusculoskeletal Disorders using Patient-Specific Multibody Dynamic Models.

Authors:  Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  Int J Comput Vis Biomech       Date:  2009-07-01

8.  The Effects of Prosthesis Inertial Parameters on Inverse Dynamics: A Probabilistic Analysis.

Authors:  Brecca M M Gaffney; Cory L Christiansen; Amanda M Murray; Casey A Myers; Peter J Laz; Bradley S Davidson
Journal:  J Verif Valid Uncertain Quantif       Date:  2017-10-31

9.  Experimental recommendations for estimating lower extremity loading based on joint and activity.

Authors:  Todd J Hullfish; John F Drazan; Josh R Baxter
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 2.789

10.  Are subject-specific musculoskeletal models robust to the uncertainties in parameter identification?

Authors:  Giordano Valente; Lorenzo Pitto; Debora Testi; Ajay Seth; Scott L Delp; Rita Stagni; Marco Viceconti; Fulvia Taddei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.