Literature DB >> 35832400

The Effects of Prosthesis Inertial Parameters on Inverse Dynamics: A Probabilistic Analysis.

Brecca M M Gaffney1, Cory L Christiansen2, Amanda M Murray3, Casey A Myers4, Peter J Laz5, Bradley S Davidson6.   

Abstract

Joint kinetic measurement is a fundamental tool used to quantify compensatory movement patterns in participants with transtibial amputation (TTA). Joint kinetics are calculated through inverse dynamics (ID) and depend on segment kinematics, external forces, and both segment and prosthetic inertial parameters (PIPS); yet the individual influence of PIPs on ID is unknown. The objective of this investigation was to assess the importance of parameterizing PIPs when calculating ID using a probabilistic analysis. A series of Monte Carlo simulations were performed to assess the influence of uncertainty in PIPs on ID. Multivariate input distributions were generated from experimentally measured PIPs (foot/shank: mass, center of mass (COM), moment of inertia) of ten prostheses and output distributions were hip and knee joint kinetics. Confidence bounds (2.5-97.5%) and sensitivity of outputs to model input parameters were calculated throughout one gait cycle. Results demonstrated that PIPs had a larger influence on joint kinetics during the swing period than the stance period (e.g., maximum hip flexion/extension moment confidence bound size: stance = 5.6 N·m, swing: 11.4 N·m). Joint kinetics were most sensitive to shank mass during both the stance and swing periods. Accurate measurement of prosthesis shank mass is necessary to calculate joint kinetics with ID in participants with TTA with passive prostheses consisting of total contact carbon fiber sockets and dynamic elastic response feet during walking.
Copyright © 2017 by ASME.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amputee; inverse dynamics; probabilistic analysis; prosthesis inertial parameters

Year:  2017        PMID: 35832400      PMCID: PMC8597549          DOI: 10.1115/1.4038175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Verif Valid Uncertain Quantif        ISSN: 2377-2158


  37 in total

1.  Estimating segment inertial properties: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with existing methods.

Authors:  M Mungiole; P E Martin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  A review of probabilistic analysis in orthopaedic biomechanics.

Authors:  P J Laz; M Browne
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.617

3.  Compensatory mechanisms in below-knee amputee gait in response to increasing steady-state walking speeds.

Authors:  Anne K Silverman; Nicholas P Fey; Albert Portillo; Judith G Walden; Gordon Bosker; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Explorations in statistics: the bootstrap.

Authors:  Douglas Curran-Everett
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.288

5.  Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov's segment inertia parameters.

Authors:  P de Leva
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  A general model for estimating lower extremity inertial properties of individuals with transtibial amputation.

Authors:  Abbie E Ferris; Jeremy D Smith; Gary D Heise; Richard N Hinrichs; Philip E Martin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Resultant lower extremity joint moments in below-knee amputees during running stance.

Authors:  D I Miller
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Effect of alterations in prosthetic shank mass on the metabolic costs of ambulation in above-knee amputees.

Authors:  J M Czerniecki; A Gitter; K Weaver
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.159

9.  Measuring the inertial properties of cadaver segments.

Authors:  S A Lephart
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Mass and mass distribution of below-knee prostheses: effect on gait efficacy and self-selected walking speed.

Authors:  J F Lehmann; R Price; R Okumura; K Questad; B J de Lateur; A Négretot
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.966

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.