Literature DB >> 18295561

In vivo static creep loading of the rat forelimb reduces ulnar structural properties at time-zero and induces damage-dependent woven bone formation.

Jennifer A Lynch1, Matthew J Silva.   

Abstract

Periosteal woven bone forms in response to stress fractures and pathological overload. The mechanical factors that regulate woven bone formation are poorly understood. Fatigue loading of the rat ulna triggers a woven bone response in proportion to the level of applied fatigue displacement. However, because fatigue produces damage by application of cyclic loading it is unclear if the osteogenic response is due to bone damage (injury response) or dynamic strain (adaptive response). Creep loading, in contrast to fatigue, involves application of a static force. Our objectives were to use static creep loading of the rat forelimb to produce discrete levels of ulnar damage, and subsequently to determine the bone response over time. We hypothesized that 1) increases in applied displacement during loading correspond to ulnae with increased crack number, length and extent, as well as decreased mechanical properties; and 2) in vivo creep loading stimulates a damage-dependent dose-response in periosteal woven bone formation. Creep loading of the rat forelimb to progressive levels of sub-fracture displacement led to progressive bone damage (cracks) and loss of whole-bone mechanical properties (especially stiffness) at time-zero. For example, loading to 60% of fracture displacement caused a 60% loss of ulnar stiffness and a 25% loss of strength. Survival experiments showed that woven bone formed in a dose-dependent manner, with greater amounts of woven bone in ulnae that were loaded to higher displacements. Furthermore, after 14 days the mechanical properties of the loaded limb were equal or superior to control, indicating functional repair of the initial damage. We conclude that bone damage created without dynamic strain triggers a woven bone response, and thus infer that the woven bone response reported after fatigue loading and in stress fractures is in large part a response to bone damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18295561      PMCID: PMC2441934          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  26 in total

1.  Response of the osteocyte syncytium adjacent to and distant from linear microcracks during adaptation to cyclic fatigue loading.

Authors:  S A Colopy; J Benz-Dean; J G Barrett; S J Sample; Y Lu; N A Danova; V L Kalscheur; R Vanderby; M D Markel; P Muir
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Compact bone fatigue damage--I. Residual strength and stiffness.

Authors:  D R Carter; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Influence of the long-term, continuous bending on the bone. An experimental study on the tibia of the rabbit.

Authors:  J Hert; M Lisková; B Landrgot
Journal:  Folia Morphol (Praha)       Date:  1969

4.  Bone remodeling due to continuously applied loads.

Authors:  J B Meade; S C Cowin; J J Klawitter; W C Van Buskirk; H B Skinner
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Quantification of bone stresses during remodeling.

Authors:  C R Hassler; E F Rybicki; K D Cummings; L C Clark
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry derived structural geometry for stress fracture prediction in male U.S. Marine Corps recruits.

Authors:  T J Beck; C B Ruff; F A Mourtada; R A Shaffer; K Maxwell-Williams; G L Kao; D J Sartoris; S Brodine
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Modulation of appositional and longitudinal bone growth in the rat ulna by applied static and dynamic force.

Authors:  A G Robling; K M Duijvelaar; J V Geevers; N Ohashi; C H Turner
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Degradation of bone structural properties by accumulation and coalescence of microcracks.

Authors:  N A Danova; S A Colopy; C L Radtke; V L Kalscheur; M D Markel; R Vanderby; R P McCabe; A J Escarcega; P Muir
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Noninvasive fatigue fracture model of the rat ulna.

Authors:  A E Tami; P Nasser; M B Schaffler; M L Knothe Tate
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Experimental and finite element analysis of the rat ulnar loading model-correlations between strain and bone formation following fatigue loading.

Authors:  S P Kotha; Y-F Hsieh; R M Strigel; R Müller; M J Silva
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  14 in total

1.  Vertebral deformity arising from an accelerated "creep" mechanism.

Authors:  Jin Luo; Phillip Pollintine; Edward Gomm; Patricia Dolan; Michael A Adams
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Variability of tissue mineral density can determine physiological creep of human vertebral cancellous bone.

Authors:  Do-Gyoon Kim; Daniel Shertok; Boon Ching Tee; Yener N Yeni
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Diffuse microdamage in bone activates anabolic response by osteoblasts via involvement of voltage-gated calcium channels.

Authors:  Hyungjin Jung; Ozan Akkus
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Structural and mechanical repair of diffuse damage in cortical bone in vivo.

Authors:  Zeynep Seref-Ferlengez; Jelena Basta-Pljakic; Oran D Kennedy; Claudy J Philemon; Mitchell B Schaffler
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Load/strain distribution between ulna and radius in the mouse forearm compression loading model.

Authors:  Yunkai Lu; Ganesh Thiagarajan; Daniel P Nicolella; Mark L Johnson
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 6.  Establishing biomechanical mechanisms in mouse models: practical guidelines for systematically evaluating phenotypic changes in the diaphyses of long bones.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen; Matthew J Silva; Deepak Vashishth; X Edward Guo; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Adaptive and Injury Response of Bone to Mechanical Loading.

Authors:  Sarah H McBride; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  Bonekey Osteovision       Date:  2012-10-10

8.  Cortical and trabecular bone adaptation to incremental load magnitudes using the mouse tibial axial compression loading model.

Authors:  Alyssa M Weatherholt; Robyn K Fuchs; Stuart J Warden
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Experimental and finite element analysis of dynamic loading of the mouse forearm.

Authors:  Ganesh Thiagarajan; Yunkai Lu; Mark Dallas; Mark L Johnson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Increased variability of bone tissue mineral density resulting from estrogen deficiency influences creep behavior in a rat vertebral body.

Authors:  Do-Gyoon Kim; Anand R Navalgund; Boon Ching Tee; Garrett J Noble; Richard T Hart; Hye Ri Lee
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.