Literature DB >> 25917136

Establishing biomechanical mechanisms in mouse models: practical guidelines for systematically evaluating phenotypic changes in the diaphyses of long bones.

Karl J Jepsen1, Matthew J Silva2, Deepak Vashishth3, X Edward Guo4, Marjolein C H van der Meulen5.   

Abstract

Mice are widely used in studies of skeletal biology, and assessment of their bones by mechanical testing is a critical step when evaluating the functional effects of an experimental perturbation. For example, a gene knockout may target a pathway important in bone formation and result in a "low bone mass" phenotype. But how well does the skeleton bear functional loads; eg, how much do bones deform during loading and how resistant are bones to fracture? By systematic evaluation of bone morphological, densitometric, and mechanical properties, investigators can establish the "biomechanical mechanisms" whereby an experimental perturbation alters whole-bone mechanical function. The goal of this review is to clarify these biomechanical mechanisms and to make recommendations for systematically evaluating phenotypic changes in mouse bones, with a focus on long-bone diaphyses and cortical bone. Further, minimum reportable standards for testing conditions and outcome variables are suggested that will improve the comparison of data across studies. Basic biomechanical principles are reviewed, followed by a description of the cross-sectional morphological properties that best inform the net cellular effects of a given experimental perturbation and are most relevant to biomechanical function. Although morphology is critical, whole-bone mechanical properties can only be determined accurately by a mechanical test. The functional importance of stiffness, maximum load, postyield displacement, and work-to-fracture are reviewed. Because bone and body size are often strongly related, strategies to adjust whole-bone properties for body mass are detailed. Finally, a comprehensive framework is presented using real data, and several examples from the literature are reviewed to illustrate how to synthesize morphological, tissue-level, and whole-bone mechanical properties of mouse long bones.
© 2015 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BIOMECHANICAL MECHANISMS; BIOMECHANICS, BONE; CORTICAL BONE; FUNCTION; MOUSE MODELS

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25917136      PMCID: PMC4794979          DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  66 in total

Review 1.  Gene targeting in mice: a review.

Authors:  Hicham Bouabe; Klaus Okkenhaug
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2013

2.  Growing C57Bl/6 mice increase whole bone mechanical properties by increasing geometric and material properties.

Authors:  M D Brodt; C B Ellis; M J Silva
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  A standard test for laboratory animal bone.

Authors:  A H Burstein; V H Frankel
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 4.  Transgenic mouse models of metabolic bone disease.

Authors:  L K McCauley
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  Decreased collagen organization and content are associated with reduced strength of demineralized and intact bone in the SAMP6 mouse.

Authors:  Matthew J Silva; Michael D Brodt; Brigitte Wopenka; Stavros Thomopoulos; Derek Williams; Maurice H M Wassen; Mike Ko; Nozomu Kusano; Ruud A Bank
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 6.  Basic biomechanical measurements of bone: a tutorial.

Authors:  C H Turner; D B Burr
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Effects of Deletion of ERα in Osteoblast-Lineage Cells on Bone Mass and Adaptation to Mechanical Loading Differ in Female and Male Mice.

Authors:  Katherine M Melville; Natalie H Kelly; Gina Surita; Daniel B Buchalter; John C Schimenti; Russell P Main; F Patrick Ross; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  How tough is brittle bone? Investigating osteogenesis imperfecta in mouse bone.

Authors:  R O Ritchie; S J Shefelbine; A Carriero; E A Zimmermann; A Paluszny; S Y Tang; H Bale; B Busse; T Alliston; G Kazakia
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 9.  Engineering subtle targeted mutations into the mouse genome.

Authors:  Douglas B Menke
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 10.  Standardized nomenclature, symbols, and units for bone histomorphometry: a 2012 update of the report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee.

Authors:  David W Dempster; Juliet E Compston; Marc K Drezner; Francis H Glorieux; John A Kanis; Hartmut Malluche; Pierre J Meunier; Susan M Ott; Robert R Recker; A Michael Parfitt
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  87 in total

1.  Zoledronate treatment has different effects in mouse strains with contrasting baseline bone mechanical phenotypes.

Authors:  M W Aref; E M B McNerny; D Brown; K J Jepsen; M R Allen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Role of the protease corin in chondrogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Haibin Zhou; Jinsong Zhu; Meng Liu; Qingyu Wu; Ningzheng Dong
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.963

3.  Skeletal cell YAP and TAZ combinatorially promote bone development.

Authors:  Christopher D Kegelman; Devon E Mason; James H Dawahare; Daniel J Horan; Genevieve D Vigil; Scott S Howard; Alexander G Robling; Teresita M Bellido; Joel D Boerckel
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Genetics of aging bone.

Authors:  Douglas J Adams; David W Rowe; Cheryl L Ackert-Bicknell
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  Rad GTPase is essential for the regulation of bone density and bone marrow adipose tissue in mice.

Authors:  Catherine N Withers; Drew M Brown; Innocent Byiringiro; Matthew R Allen; Keith W Condon; Jonathan Satin; Douglas A Andres
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Alterations to the Gut Microbiome Impair Bone Strength and Tissue Material Properties.

Authors:  Jason D Guss; Michael W Horsfield; Fernanda F Fontenele; Taylor N Sandoval; Marysol Luna; Fnu Apoorva; Svetlana F Lima; Rodrigo C Bicalho; Ankur Singh; Ruth E Ley; Marjolein Ch van der Meulen; Steven R Goldring; Christopher J Hernandez
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  IL-6 exhibits both cis- and trans-signaling in osteocytes and osteoblasts, but only trans-signaling promotes bone formation and osteoclastogenesis.

Authors:  Narelle E McGregor; Melissa Murat; Jeevithan Elango; Ingrid J Poulton; Emma C Walker; Blessing Crimeen-Irwin; Patricia W M Ho; Jonathan H Gooi; T John Martin; Natalie A Sims
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  The development of inter-strain variation in cortical and trabecular traits during growth of the mouse lumbar vertebral body.

Authors:  M A Ramcharan; M E Faillace; Z Guengerich; V A Williams; K J Jepsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  External Bone Size Is a Key Determinant of Strength-Decline Trajectories of Aging Male Radii.

Authors:  Erin Mr Bigelow; Daniella M Patton; Ferrous S Ward; Antonio Ciarelli; Michael Casden; Andrea Clark; Robert W Goulet; Michael D Morris; Stephen H Schlecht; Gurjit S Mandair; Todd L Bredbenner; David H Kohn; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Osteocyte Death and Bone Overgrowth in Mice Lacking Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors 1 and 2 in Mature Osteoblasts and Osteocytes.

Authors:  Jennifer McKenzie; Craig Smith; Kannan Karuppaiah; Joshua Langberg; Matthew J Silva; David M Ornitz
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.