Literature DB >> 28867206

Evolution of Vocal Diversity through Morphological Adaptation without Vocal Learning or Complex Neural Control.

Sarah M Garcia1, Cecilia Kopuchian2, Gabriel B Mindlin3, Matthew J Fuxjager4, Pablo L Tubaro5, Franz Goller6.   

Abstract

The evolution of complex behavior is driven by the interplay of morphological specializations and neuromuscular control mechanisms [1-3], and it is often difficult to tease apart their respective contributions. Avian vocal learning and associated neural adaptations are thought to have played a major role in bird diversification [4-8], whereas functional significance of substantial morphological diversity of the vocal organ remains largely unexplored. Within the most species-rich order, Passeriformes, "tracheophones" are a suboscine group that, unlike their oscine sister taxon, does not exhibit vocal learning [9] and is thought to phonate with tracheal membranes [10, 11] instead of the two independent sources found in other passerines [12-14]. Here we show tracheophones possess three sound sources, two oscine-like labial pairs and the unique tracheal membranes, which collectively represent the largest described number of sound sources for a vocal organ. Birds with experimentally disabled tracheal membranes were still able to phonate. Instead of the main sound source, the tracheal membranes constitute a morphological specialization, which, through interaction with bronchial labia, contributes to different acoustic features such as spectral complexity, amplitude modulation, and enhanced sound amplitude. In contrast, these same features arise in oscines from neuromuscular control of two labial sources [15-17]. These findings are supported by a modeling approach and provide a clear example for how a morphological adaptation of the tracheophone vocal organ can generate specific, complex sound features. Morphological specialization therefore constitutes an alternative path in the evolution of acoustic diversity to that of oscine vocal learning and complex neural control.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  functional morphology; suboscine; syrinx; tracheophone

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28867206      PMCID: PMC5599221          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.07.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  25 in total

1.  Behaviourally driven gene expression reveals song nuclei in hummingbird brain.

Authors:  E D Jarvis; S Ribeiro; M L da Silva; D Ventura; J Vielliard; C V Mello
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  The impact of learning on sexual selection and speciation.

Authors:  Machteld N Verzijden; Carel ten Cate; Maria R Servedio; Genevieve M Kozak; Jenny W Boughman; Erik I Svensson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Role of syringeal muscles in controlling the phonology of bird song.

Authors:  F Goller; R A Suthers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The application of functional morphology to evolutionary studies.

Authors:  F Galis
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Role of syringeal muscles in gating airflow and sound production in singing brown thrashers.

Authors:  F Goller; R A Suthers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Fibre architecture and song activation rates of syringeal muscles are not lateralized in the European starling.

Authors:  A M Uchida; R A Meyers; B G Cooper; F Goller
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Acoustic signatures of sound source-tract coupling.

Authors:  Ezequiel M Arneodo; Yonatan Sanz Perl; Gabriel B Mindlin
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2011-04-25

8.  In situ biomechanics of the syrinx and sound generation in pigeons.

Authors:  F Goller; O N Larsen
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Songbirds use pulse tone register in two voices to generate low-frequency sound.

Authors:  Kenneth K Jensen; Brenton G Cooper; Ole N Larsen; Franz Goller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Convergent transcriptional specializations in the brains of humans and song-learning birds.

Authors:  Andreas R Pfenning; Erina Hara; Osceola Whitney; Miriam V Rivas; Rui Wang; Petra L Roulhac; Jason T Howard; Morgan Wirthlin; Peter V Lovell; Ganeshkumar Ganapathy; Jacquelyn Mouncastle; M Arthur Moseley; J Will Thompson; Erik J Soderblom; Atsushi Iriki; Masaki Kato; M Thomas P Gilbert; Guojie Zhang; Trygve Bakken; Angie Bongaarts; Amy Bernard; Ed Lein; Claudio V Mello; Alexander J Hartemink; Erich D Jarvis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  5 in total

1.  Tonality over a broad frequency range is linked to vocal learning in birds.

Authors:  Marius Faiß; Tobias Riede; Franz Goller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 5.530

2.  Vocal development through morphological computation.

Authors:  Yisi S Zhang; Asif A Ghazanfar
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 8.029

3.  The evolution of the syrinx: An acoustic theory.

Authors:  Tobias Riede; Scott L Thomson; Ingo R Titze; Franz Goller
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 8.029

4.  Roars, groans and moans: Anatomical correlates of vocal diversity in polygynous deer.

Authors:  Roland Frey; Megan Tompkins Wyman; Malcolm Johnston; Michael Schofield; Yann Locatelli; David Reby
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Different frequency control mechanisms and the exploitation of frequency space in passerines.

Authors:  Franz Goller; Jay Love; Gabriel Mindlin
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.