Literature DB >> 18285819

Quality control of DNA break metabolism: in the 'end', it's a good thing.

Roland Kanaar1, Claire Wyman, Rodney Rothstein.   

Abstract

DNA ends pose specific problems in the control of genetic information quality. Ends of broken DNA need to be rejoined to avoid genome rearrangements, whereas natural DNA ends of linear chromosomes, telomeres, need to be stable and hidden from the DNA damage response. Efficient DNA end metabolism, either at induced DNA breaks or telomeres, does not result from the machine-like precision of molecular reactions, but rather from messier, more stochastic processes. The necessary molecular interactions are dynamically unstable, with constructive and destructive processes occurring in competition. In the end, quality control comes from the constant building up and tearing down of inappropriate, but also appropriate reaction steps in combination with factors that only slightly shift the equilibrium to eventually favour appropriate events. Thus, paradoxically, enzymes antagonizing DNA end metabolism help to ensure that genome maintenance becomes a robust process.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18285819      PMCID: PMC2262039          DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2008.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  88 in total

1.  A biochemically defined system for mammalian nonhomologous DNA end joining.

Authors:  Yunmei Ma; Haihui Lu; Brigette Tippin; Myron F Goodman; Noriko Shimazaki; Osamu Koiwai; Chih-Lin Hsieh; Klaus Schwarz; Michael R Lieber
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2004-12-03       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 2.  DNA repair: keeping it together.

Authors:  Michael Lisby; Rodney Rothstein
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  DNA breaks promote genomic instability by impeding proper chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Julia A Kaye; Justine A Melo; Stephanie K Cheung; Moreshwar B Vaze; James E Haber; David P Toczyski
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Mediating repair.

Authors:  Patrick Sung
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 15.369

5.  The Artemis:DNA-PKcs endonuclease cleaves DNA loops, flaps, and gaps.

Authors:  Yunmei Ma; Klaus Schwarz; Michael R Lieber
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2005-07-12

6.  Chromosome fragmentation after induction of a double-strand break is an active process prevented by the RMX repair complex.

Authors:  Kirill Lobachev; Eric Vitriol; Jennifer Stemple; Michael A Resnick; Kerry Bloom
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  The BRCA2 homologue Brh2 nucleates RAD51 filament formation at a dsDNA-ssDNA junction.

Authors:  Haijuan Yang; Qiubai Li; Jie Fan; William K Holloman; Nikola P Pavletich
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-02-10       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  A pathway of double-strand break rejoining dependent upon ATM, Artemis, and proteins locating to gamma-H2AX foci.

Authors:  Enriqueta Riballo; Martin Kühne; Nicole Rief; Aidan Doherty; Graeme C M Smith; María-José Recio; Caroline Reis; Kirsten Dahm; Andreas Fricke; Andrea Krempler; Antony R Parker; Stephen P Jackson; Andrew Gennery; Penny A Jeggo; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2004-12-03       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  BRCA2 BRC motifs bind RAD51-DNA filaments.

Authors:  Vitold E Galkin; Fumiko Esashi; Xiong Yu; Shixin Yang; Stephen C West; Edward H Egelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-06-03       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  UvrD helicase, unlike Rep helicase, dismantles RecA nucleoprotein filaments in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Xavier Veaute; Stéphane Delmas; Marjorie Selva; Josette Jeusset; Eric Le Cam; Ivan Matic; Francis Fabre; Marie-Agnès Petit
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Regulation of recombination and genomic maintenance.

Authors:  Wolf-Dietrich Heyer
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 2.  When stem cells grow old: phenotypes and mechanisms of stem cell aging.

Authors:  Michael B Schultz; David A Sinclair
Journal:  Development       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 3.  DNA-damage repair; the good, the bad, and the ugly.

Authors:  Razqallah Hakem
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 4.  Repair of strand breaks by homologous recombination.

Authors:  Maria Jasin; Rodney Rothstein
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 5.  MRN and the race to the break.

Authors:  Agnieszka Rupnik; Noel F Lowndes; Muriel Grenon
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Crystal structure of the Mre11-Rad50-ATPγS complex: understanding the interplay between Mre11 and Rad50.

Authors:  Hye Seong Lim; Jin Seok Kim; Young Bong Park; Gwang Hyeon Gwon; Yunje Cho
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 7.  The emerging role of nuclear architecture in DNA repair and genome maintenance.

Authors:  Tom Misteli; Evi Soutoglou
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 94.444

8.  Localization of recombination proteins and Srs2 reveals anti-recombinase function in vivo.

Authors:  Rebecca C Burgess; Michael Lisby; Veronika Altmannova; Lumir Krejci; Patrick Sung; Rodney Rothstein
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 9.  Taming the tiger by the tail: modulation of DNA damage responses by telomeres.

Authors:  David Lydall
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  ATM and Artemis promote homologous recombination of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks in G2.

Authors:  Andrea Beucher; Julie Birraux; Leopoldine Tchouandong; Olivia Barton; Atsushi Shibata; Sandro Conrad; Aaron A Goodarzi; Andrea Krempler; Penny A Jeggo; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.