Literature DB >> 15589152

Chromosome fragmentation after induction of a double-strand break is an active process prevented by the RMX repair complex.

Kirill Lobachev1, Eric Vitriol, Jennifer Stemple, Michael A Resnick, Kerry Bloom.   

Abstract

Chromosome aberrations are common outcomes of exposure to DNA-damaging agents or altered replication events and are associated with various diseases and a variety of carcinomas, including leukemias, lymphomas, sarcomas, and epithelial tumors. The incidence of aberrations can be greatly increased as a result of defects in DNA repair pathways. Although there is considerable information about the molecular events associated with the induction and repair of a double-strand break (DSB), little is known about the events that ultimately lead to translocations or deletions through the formation of chromosome breaks or the dissociation of broken ends. We describe a system for visualizing DNA ends at the site of a DSB in living cells. After induction of the break, DNA ends flanking the DSB site in wild-type cells remained adjacent. Loss of a functional RMX complex (Rad50/Mre11/Xrs2) or a mutation in the Rad50 Zn-hook structure resulted in DNA ends being dispersed in approximately 10%-20% of cells. Thus, the RMX complex holds broken ends together and counteracts mitotic spindle forces that can be destructive to damaged chromosomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15589152     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.11.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  79 in total

1.  Rad52 function prevents chromosome loss and truncation in Candida albicans.

Authors:  E Andaluz; A Bellido; J Gómez-Raja; A Selmecki; K Bouchonville; R Calderone; J Berman; G Larriba
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.501

2.  Multiple pathways suppress telomere addition to DNA breaks in the Drosophila germline.

Authors:  Michelle Beaucher; Xiao-Feng Zheng; Flavia Amariei; Yikang S Rong
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Quality control of DNA break metabolism: in the 'end', it's a good thing.

Authors:  Roland Kanaar; Claire Wyman; Rodney Rothstein
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Positional stability of single double-strand breaks in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Evi Soutoglou; Jonas F Dorn; Kundan Sengupta; Maria Jasin; Andre Nussenzweig; Thomas Ried; Gaudenz Danuser; Tom Misteli
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 28.824

5.  Pericentric chromatin is organized into an intramolecular loop in mitosis.

Authors:  Elaine Yeh; Julian Haase; Leocadia V Paliulis; Ajit Joglekar; Lisa Bond; David Bouck; E D Salmon; Kerry S Bloom
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  A recombination execution checkpoint regulates the choice of homologous recombination pathway during DNA double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Suvi Jain; Neal Sugawara; John Lydeard; Moreshwar Vaze; Nicolas Tanguy Le Gac; James E Haber
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Mechanisms that regulate localization of a DNA double-strand break to the nuclear periphery.

Authors:  Pranav Oza; Sue L Jaspersen; Adriana Miele; Job Dekker; Craig L Peterson
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Coordination and processing of DNA ends during double-strand break repair: the role of the bacteriophage T4 Mre11/Rad50 (MR) complex.

Authors:  Joshua R Almond; Bradley A Stohr; Anil K Panigrahi; Dustin W Albrecht; Scott W Nelson; Kenneth N Kreuzer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Repair of strand breaks by homologous recombination.

Authors:  Maria Jasin; Rodney Rothstein
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 10.  Mechanisms of double-strand break repair in somatic mammalian cells.

Authors:  Andrea J Hartlerode; Ralph Scully
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.