Literature DB >> 35168398

More than just a pretty face? The relationship between immune function and perceived facial attractiveness.

Summer Mengelkoch1, Jeff Gassen1, Marjorie L Prokosch1, Gary W Boehm1, Sarah E Hill1.   

Abstract

It has long been hypothesized that attractiveness provides a cue to a target's health and immunocompetence. However, much of the research testing this hypothesis has relied on a small number of indirect proxies of immune function, and the results of this research have been mixed. Here, we build on this past research, examining the relationship between target attractiveness and (i) self-reported health, (ii) in vivo measures of inflammation and white blood cell count/composition, and (iii) in vitro tests of targets' immune function, including (c1) leucocyte proliferation in response to immunological stimulants, (c2) phagocytosis of Escherichia coli bioparticles, (c3) NK cell-mediated lysis of target tumour cells, and (c4) Staphylococcus aureus growth in isolated plasma. Results revealed multiple, sometimes sex-differentiated, relationships between targets' immune function and others' perceptions of their attractiveness. Together, this work suggests complex, often sex-differentiated relationships between immune function, health, and attractiveness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attractiveness; evolution; health; immune function; sex differences; sexual selection

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35168398      PMCID: PMC8848230          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  51 in total

1.  When facial attractiveness is only skin deep.

Authors:  Benedict C Jones; Anthony C Little; D Michael Burt; David I Perrett
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations.

Authors:  D Jones; K Hill
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1993-09

3.  Symmetry and perceived facial attractiveness: a monozygotic co-twin comparison.

Authors:  L Mealey; R Bridgstock; G C Townsend
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-01

4.  The masculinity paradox: facial masculinity and beardedness interact to determine women's ratings of men's facial attractiveness.

Authors:  B J W Dixson; D Sulikowski; A Gouda-Vossos; M J Rantala; R C Brooks
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  The immune response during the luteal phase of the ovarian cycle: a Th2-type response?

Authors:  M Faas; A Bouman; H Moesa; M J Heineman; L de Leij; G Schuiling
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Cross-cultural variation in men's preference for sexual dimorphism in women's faces.

Authors:  Urszula M Marcinkowska; Mikhail V Kozlov; Huajian Cai; Jorge Contreras-Garduño; Barnaby J Dixson; Gavita A Oana; Gwenaël Kaminski; Norman P Li; Minna T Lyons; Ike E Onyishi; Keshav Prasai; Farid Pazhoohi; Pavol Prokop; Sandra L Rosales Cardozo; Nicolle Sydney; Jose C Yong; Markus J Rantala
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Facial attractiveness judgements reflect learning of parental age characteristics.

Authors:  David I Perrett; Ian S Penton-Voak; Anthony C Little; Bernard P Tiddeman; D Michael Burt; Natalie Schmidt; Roz Oxley; Nicholas Kinloch; Louise Barrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Body height, immunity, facial and vocal attractiveness in young men.

Authors:  Ilona Skrinda; Tatjana Krama; Sanita Kecko; Fhionna R Moore; Ants Kaasik; Laila Meija; Vilnis Lietuvietis; Markus J Rantala; Indrikis Krams
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-10-18

9.  Facial appearance is a cue to oestrogen levels in women.

Authors:  M J Law Smith; D I Perrett; B C Jones; R E Cornwell; F R Moore; D R Feinberg; L G Boothroyd; S J Durrani; M R Stirrat; S Whiten; R M Pitman; S G Hillier
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Do men's faces really signal heritable immunocompetence?

Authors:  Isabel M L Scott; Andrew P Clark; Lynda G Boothroyd; Ian S Penton-Voak
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.671

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Darwin Versus Wallace: Esthetic Evolution and Preferential Mate Choice.

Authors:  Adam C Davis; Steven Arnocky
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-25

2.  Evidence against the "anomalous-is-bad" stereotype in Hadza hunter gatherers.

Authors:  Clifford I Workman; Kristopher M Smith; Coren L Apicella; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.