Literature DB >> 18283419

Utilizing high throughput screening data for predictive toxicology models: protocols and application to MLSCN assays.

Rajarshi Guha1, Stephan C Schürer.   

Abstract

Computational toxicology is emerging as an encouraging alternative to experimental testing. The Molecular Libraries Screening Center Network (MLSCN) as part of the NIH Molecular Libraries Roadmap has recently started generating large and diverse screening datasets, which are publicly available in PubChem. In this report, we investigate various aspects of developing computational models to predict cell toxicity based on cell proliferation screening data generated in the MLSCN. By capturing feature-based information in those datasets, such predictive models would be useful in evaluating cell-based screening results in general (for example from reporter assays) and could be used as an aid to identify and eliminate potentially undesired compounds. Specifically we present the results of random forest ensemble models developed using different cell proliferation datasets and highlight protocols to take into account their extremely imbalanced nature. Depending on the nature of the datasets and the descriptors employed we were able to achieve percentage correct classification rates between 70% and 85% on the prediction set, though the accuracy rate dropped significantly when the models were applied to in vivo data. In this context we also compare the MLSCN cell proliferation results with animal acute toxicity data to investigate to what extent animal toxicity can be correlated and potentially predicted by proliferation results. Finally, we present a visualization technique that allows one to compare a new dataset to the training set of the models to decide whether the new dataset may be reliably predicted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18283419     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-008-9192-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  38 in total

Review 1.  HERG K+ channels: friend and foe.

Authors:  J I Vandenberg; B D Walker; T J Campbell
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 14.819

2.  Genetic Algorithm guided Selection: variable selection and subset selection.

Authors:  Sung Jin Cho; Mark A Hermsmeier
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug

3.  On the nature, evolution and future of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) in toxicology.

Authors:  G D Veith
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2004 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Prediction of the rodent carcinogenicity of 60 pesticides by the DEREKfW expert system.

Authors:  Pierre Crettaz; Romualdo Benigni
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Current status of methods for defining the applicability domain of (quantitative) structure-activity relationships. The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 52.

Authors:  Tatiana I Netzeva; Andrew Worth; Tom Aldenberg; Romualdo Benigni; Mark T D Cronin; Paolo Gramatica; Joanna S Jaworska; Scott Kahn; Gilles Klopman; Carol A Marchant; Glenn Myatt; Nina Nikolova-Jeliazkova; Grace Y Patlewicz; Roger Perkins; David Roberts; Terry Schultz; David W Stanton; Johannes J M van de Sandt; Weida Tong; Gilman Veith; Chihae Yang
Journal:  Altern Lab Anim       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.303

6.  A novel QSAR model for predicting induction of apoptosis by 4-aryl-4H-chromenes.

Authors:  Antreas Afantitis; Georgia Melagraki; Haralambos Sarimveis; Panayiotis A Koutentis; John Markopoulos; Olga Igglessi-Markopoulou
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Local lazy regression: making use of the neighborhood to improve QSAR predictions.

Authors:  Rajarshi Guha; Debojyoti Dutta; Peter C Jurs; Ting Chen
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  QSAR prediction of estrogen activity for a large set of diverse chemicals under the guidance of OECD principles.

Authors:  Huanxiang Liu; Ester Papa; Paola Gramatica
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.739

9.  QSARS for acute toxicity of halogenated benzenes to bacteria in natural waters.

Authors:  Guang-Hua Lu; Chao Wang; Yu-Mei Li
Journal:  Biomed Environ Sci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.118

10.  Acetylcholinesterase: converting a vulnerable target to a template for antidotes and detection of inhibitor exposure.

Authors:  Palmer Taylor; Zrinka Kovarik; Elsa Reiner; Zoran Radić
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2006-11-24       Impact factor: 4.221

View more
  18 in total

1.  An efficient algorithm coupled with synthetic minority over-sampling technique to classify imbalanced PubChem BioAssay data.

Authors:  Ming Hao; Yanli Wang; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 6.558

2.  Naïve Bayesian Models for Vero Cell Cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Alexander L Perryman; Jimmy S Patel; Riccardo Russo; Eric Singleton; Nancy Connell; Sean Ekins; Joel S Freundlich
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  On the interpretation and interpretability of quantitative structure-activity relationship models.

Authors:  Rajarshi Guha
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Modelling compound cytotoxicity using conformal prediction and PubChem HTS data.

Authors:  Fredrik Svensson; Ulf Norinder; Andreas Bender
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 3.524

5.  Towards interoperable and reproducible QSAR analyses: Exchange of datasets.

Authors:  Ola Spjuth; Egon L Willighagen; Rajarshi Guha; Martin Eklund; Jarl Es Wikberg
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.514

6.  High-throughput screening based identification of small molecule antagonists of integrin CD11b/CD18 ligand binding.

Authors:  Mohd Hafeez Faridi; Dony Maiguel; Brock T Brown; Eigo Suyama; Constantinos J Barth; Michael Hedrick; Stefan Vasile; Eduard Sergienko; Stephan Schürer; Vineet Gupta
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  A machine learning-based method to improve docking scoring functions and its application to drug repurposing.

Authors:  Sarah L Kinnings; Nina Liu; Peter J Tonge; Richard M Jackson; Lei Xie; Philip E Bourne
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  A novel method for mining highly imbalanced high-throughput screening data in PubChem.

Authors:  Qingliang Li; Yanli Wang; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 9.  Getting the most out of PubChem for virtual screening.

Authors:  Sunghwan Kim
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 6.098

10.  Binding affinity prediction with property-encoded shape distribution signatures.

Authors:  Sourav Das; Michael P Krein; Curt M Breneman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.