Literature DB >> 18282721

The three-dimensional glenoid vault model can estimate normal glenoid version in osteoarthritis.

Jason J Scalise1, Michael J Codsi, Jason Bryan, Joseph P Iannotti.   

Abstract

Glenohumeral arthroplasty can involve correcting pathologic glenoid tilt or version. Predicting the physiologic glenoid version for a particular individual can be difficult. We propose using a previously validated, 3-dimensional, glenoid vault model as a template to predict normal glenoid version. Computed tomography scans of both shoulders were obtained in 14 subjects with unilateral glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Custom-developed graphic software was used to create a 3-D reconstruction of each scapula. Within the software, the vault model was placed in a best-fit orientation into each glenoid vault independently by 3 observers who were blinded to the contralateral scapula. Measurement differences between the glenoid and vault model were analyzed by repeated-measures analysis of variance. Standard errors of measurement (SEM) were calculated. Interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities were assessed. The healthy glenoid version averaged -7.0 degrees (SEM, 0.7 degrees ; range, 0 degrees to -14 degrees ). The arthritic glenoid version averaged -15.6 degrees (SEM, 0.7 degrees ; range, 1 degrees to -33 degrees ; P < .0001). The version of the implanted vault model measured -7.1 degrees (SEM, 0.7 degrees ; range, -1 degrees to -15 degrees ) on the healthy side and -7.2 degrees (SEM, 0.7 degrees ; range -2 degrees to -11 degrees ) on the arthritic side. Measurements between observers were not significantly different (P = .98). Interobserver and intraobserver correlation coefficients were 0.79 (P < .001) and 0.80 (P < .001). In the arthritic glenoid, the vault model reproducibly closely approximated the version of the normal contralateral glenoid, -7.2 degrees vs -7.0 degrees (P = .99) and is a novel and accurate method of estimating the normal glenoid version. This technique may be valuable in correcting pathologic glenoid version due to arthritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18282721     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  30 in total

1.  Defining the normal acetabular vault in adult males and females using a novel three-dimensional model.

Authors:  Wael K Barsoum; Travis Smith; Leonard Buller; Feno Monaco; Alison Klika; Constantine Mavroudis; Jason Bryan
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Surgical management of the biconcave (B2) glenoid.

Authors:  Kenneth W Donohue; Eric T Ricchetti; Joseph P Iannotti
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

3.  Axillary view: arthritic glenohumeral anatomy and changes after ream and run.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Akash Gupta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Thickness Distribution of Glenohumeral Joint Cartilage.

Authors:  Christoph Schleich; Bernd Bittersohl; Gerald Antoch; Rüdiger Krauspe; Christoph Zilkens; Jörn Kircher
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Reliability of measurements performed on two dimensional and three dimensional computed tomography in glenoid assessment for instability.

Authors:  Anna Maria Kubicka; Jakub Stefaniak; Przemysław Lubiatowski; Jan Długosz; Marcin Dzianach; Marcin Redman; Janusz Piontek; Leszek Romanowski
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  CORR Insights®: Does Postoperative Glenoid Retroversion Affect the 2-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Michael Lawrence Pearl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  A 3D-CT scan study of the humeral and glenoid planes in 150 normal shoulders.

Authors:  Lieven De Wilde; Saartje Defoort; Tom R G M Verstraeten; Wendy Speeckaert; Philippe Debeer
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 1.246

8.  Biometrical analysis of the shoulder joint regarding glenoid implant dimensions for arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jörn Kircher; Bernd Bittersohl; Christoph Zilkens; Achim Hedtmann; Rüdiger Krauspe
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 1.246

9.  Multilevel glenoid morphology and retroversion assessment in Walch B2 and B3 types.

Authors:  Mohammad Samim; Mandeep Virk; David Mai; Kamran Munawar; Joseph Zuckerman; Soterios Gyftopoulos
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Is premorbid glenoid anatomy altered in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis?

Authors:  Eric T Ricchetti; Michael D Hendel; David N Collins; Joseph P Iannotti
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.