Literature DB >> 21656044

A 3D-CT scan study of the humeral and glenoid planes in 150 normal shoulders.

Lieven De Wilde1, Saartje Defoort, Tom R G M Verstraeten, Wendy Speeckaert, Philippe Debeer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine the normal three-dimensional relationship between the humeral and the glenoid plane of the individual patient. We measured the three-dimensional angle between the glenoid plane and the humeral plane (glenohumeral angle, °GH) and the angle between the plane of the scapula and the plane of the glenoid (glenoscapular angle, °GS) with the patient in a standardized position to the CT scan gantry. We hypothesized that a normal distribution with a small variation would exist for both angles.
METHODS: A total of 150 conventional CT scans of normal shoulders from patients aged between 18 and 80 years were examined and three-dimensional reconstructions were derived from it. The descriptive statistics and the variability of °GH and °GS were determined.
RESULTS: The mean °GH was 57.9°, and the mean °GS was -3.77°. The overall reliability of the measurement was good. Descriptive statistics of this study confirm the normal distribution and a narrow variation of both parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to determine the normal 3D relationship between the humerus and the glenoid (°GH). This new three-dimensional anatomical information of the normal glenohumeral relationship and glenoid can be used to distinguish normal from pathological anatomy, as well as alternative surgical guidance especially in bony deficient glenoids. Level of Evidence Level II Anatomical Study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21656044     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-011-0836-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  28 in total

1.  Glenohumeral relationship in the transverse plane of the body.

Authors:  Lieven F De Wilde; Bart M Berghs; Frédéric VandeVyver; Alexander Schepens; René C Verdonk
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Accuracy of placement of the glenoid component in reversed shoulder arthroplasty with and without navigation.

Authors:  Olivier Verborgt; Thomas De Smedt; Matthias Vanhees; Stefan Clockaerts; Paul M Parizel; Francis Van Glabbeek
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Three-dimensional glenoid deformity in patients with osteoarthritis: a radiographic analysis.

Authors:  P Habermeyer; P Magosch; V Luz; S Lichtenberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  The shape of the inferior part of the glenoid: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Pol E Huysmans; Pieter S Haen; Martin Kidd; Wouter J Dhert; Jaap W Willems
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Geometric variables in anatomic replacement of the proximal humerus: how much prosthetic geometry is necessary?

Authors:  Michael L Pearl; Sam Kurutz; Roberto Postacchini; Roberto Postachini
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Anthropometry of the scapula: clinical and surgical considerations.

Authors:  M Gallino; E Santamaria; T Doro
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Reliability of the glenoid plane.

Authors:  Lieven F De Wilde; T Verstraeten; W Speeckaert; A Karelse
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 8.  Complications of total shoulder-replacement arthroplasty.

Authors:  M A Wirth; C A Rockwood
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Glenoid size, inclination, and version: an anatomic study.

Authors:  R S Churchill; J J Brems; H Kotschi
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Two-dimensional glenoid version measurements vary with coronal and sagittal scapular rotation.

Authors:  Chris D Bryce; Andrew C Davison; Gregory S Lewis; Li Wang; Donald J Flemming; April D Armstrong
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  5 in total

1.  Morphological analysis of the glenoid version in the axial plane according to age.

Authors:  Julia Bouchaib; Philippe Clavert; Jean-François Kempf; Jean-Luc Kahn
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2013-11-30       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Thickness distribution of the glenohumeral joint cartilage: a quantitative study using computed tomography.

Authors:  Valentin Zumstein; Marko Kraljević; Annemarie Conzen; Sebastian Hoechel; Magdalena Müller-Gerbl
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Biometrical analysis of the shoulder joint regarding glenoid implant dimensions for arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jörn Kircher; Bernd Bittersohl; Christoph Zilkens; Achim Hedtmann; Rüdiger Krauspe
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Study of the variability of scapular inclination and the glenoid version - considerations for preoperative planning: clinical-radiological study.

Authors:  Petr Fulin; Martin Kysilko; David Pokorny; Radek Padr; Nikola Kasprikova; Ivan Landor; Antonin Sosna
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-01-14       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Anatomic variations in glenohumeral joint: an interpopulation study.

Authors:  Roopam Dey; Steven Roche; Theo Rosch; Tinashe Mutsvangwa; Johan Charilaou; Sudesh Sivarasu
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2018-02-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.