Literature DB >> 18281028

Attentional costs in multiple-object tracking.

Michael Tombu1, Adriane E Seiffert.   

Abstract

Attentional demands of multiple-object tracking were demonstrated using a dual-task paradigm. Participants were asked to make speeded responses based on the pitch of a tone, while at the same time tracking four of eight identical dots. Tracking difficulty was manipulated either concurrent with or after the tone task. If increasing tracking difficulty increases attentional demands, its effect should be larger when it occurs concurrent with the tone. In Experiment 1, tracking difficulty was manipulated by having all dots briefly attract one another on some trials, causing a transient increase in dot proximity and speed. Results showed that increasing proximity and speed had a significantly larger effect when it occurred at the same time as the tone task. Experiments 2 and 3 showed that manipulating either proximity or speed independently was sufficient to produce this pattern of results. Experiment 4 manipulated object contrast, which affected tracking performance equally whether it occurred concurrent with or after the tone task. Overall, results support the view that the moment-to-moment tracking of multiple objects demands attention. Understanding what factors increase the attentional demands of tracking may help to explain why tracking is sometimes successful and at other times fails.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18281028      PMCID: PMC2430981          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  36 in total

1.  Multiple object tracking and attentional processing.

Authors:  C R Sears; Z W Pylyshyn
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2000-03

Review 2.  Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision.

Authors:  Z W Pylyshyn
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2001-06

Review 3.  Objects and attention: the state of the art.

Authors:  B J Scholl
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2001-06

4.  The spatial resolution of visual attention.

Authors:  J Intriligator; P Cavanagh
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion.

Authors:  David Navon; Jeff Miller
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Does size rescaling require central attention?

Authors:  Michael Tombu; Pierre Jolicoeur
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2002-03

Review 7.  A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance.

Authors:  Michael Tombu; Pierre Jolicoeur
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Dual-task interference with equal task emphasis: graded capacity sharing or central postponement?

Authors:  Eric Ruthruff; Harold E Pashler; Eliot Hazeltine
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-07

9.  The cost of cortical computation.

Authors:  Peter Lennie
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  The nature of letter crowding as revealed by first- and second-order classification images.

Authors:  Anirvan S Nandy; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  24 in total

1.  The number of attentional foci and their precision are dissociated in the posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Won Mok Shim; G A Alvarez; T J Vickery; Y V Jiang
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Temporal estimation with two moving objects: overt and covert pursuit.

Authors:  Robin Baurès; Simon J Bennett; Joe Causer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Gaze-grasp coordination in obstacle avoidance: differences between binocular and monocular viewing.

Authors:  Simon Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Satisfaction in motion: Subsequent search misses are more likely in moving search displays.

Authors:  Cary Stothart; Andrew Clement; James R Brockmole
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

5.  Tracking planets and moons: mechanisms of object tracking revealed with a new paradigm.

Authors:  Michael Tombu; Adriane E Seiffert
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Looking at the center of the targets helps multiple object tracking.

Authors:  Hilda M Fehd; Adriane E Seiffert
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Divided attention in the tactile modality.

Authors:  Sharon Daniel; Thomas Andrillon; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Jeroen J A van Boxtel
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Multiple object tracking in autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Kami Koldewyn; Sarah Weigelt; Nancy Kanwisher; Yuhong Jiang
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-06

9.  Neural Signatures of the Processing of Temporal Patterns in Sound.

Authors:  Björn Herrmann; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Optimal attentional allocation in the presence of capacity constraints in uncued and cued visual search.

Authors:  Christopher J Bates; Robert A Jacobs
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.