Literature DB >> 18270544

Stuttering on function and content words across age groups of German speakers who stutter.

Katharina Dworzynski1, Peter Howell, James Au-Yeung, Dieter Rommel.   

Abstract

Recent research into stuttering in English has shown that function word disfluency decreases with age whereas content words disfluency increases. Also function words that precede a content word are significantly more likely to be stuttered than those that follow content words (Au-Yeung, Howell and Pilgrim, 1998; Howell, Au-Yeung and Sackin, 1999). These studies have used the concept of the phonological word as a means of investigating these phenomena. Phonological words help to determine the position of function words relative to content words and to establish the origin of the patterns of disfluency with respect to these two word classes. The current investigation analysed German speech for similar patterns. German contains many long compound nouns; on this basis, German content words are more complex than English ones. Thus, the patterns of disfluency within phonological words may differ between German and English. Results indicated three main findings. Function words that occupy an early position in a PW have higher rates of disfluency than those that occur later in a PW, this being most apparent for the youngest speakers. Second, function words that precede the content word in a PW have higher rates of disfluency than those that follow the content word. Third, young speakers exhibit high rates of disfluency on function words, but this drops off with age and, correspondingly, disfluency rate on content words increases. The patterns within phonological words may be general to German and English and can be accounted for by the EXPLAN model, assuming lexical class operates equivalently across these languages or that lexical categories contain some common characteristic that is associated with fluency across the languages.

Entities:  

Year:  2004        PMID: 18270544      PMCID: PMC2239212          DOI: 10.1080/14769670310001625354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Multiling Commun Disord        ISSN: 1476-9670


  19 in total

1.  Lexical access of function versus content words.

Authors:  S J Segalowitz; K C Lane
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Neural systems for sentence processing in stuttering.

Authors:  C Weber-Fox
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Exchange of stuttering from function words to content words with age.

Authors:  P Howell; J Au-Yeung; S Sackin
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Utterance length, syntactic complexity, and childhood stuttering.

Authors:  J S Yaruss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Predicting stuttering from linguistic factors for German speakers in two age groups.

Authors:  Katharina Dworzynski; Peter Howell; Ulrich Natke
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.538

6.  INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF CONTENT WORDS LEADING TO LIFESPAN DIFFERENCES IN PHONOLOGICAL DIFFICULTY IN STUTTERING.

Authors:  Peter Howell; James Au-Yeung; Stevie Sackin
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.538

7.  Syntactic complexity, fluency, and accuracy of sentence imitation in adolescents.

Authors:  S W Silverman; N B Ratner
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Grammatical function in relation to stuttering in young children.

Authors:  O Bloodstein; B F Gantwerk
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1967-12

Review 9.  The covert repair hypothesis: prearticulatory repair processes in normal and stuttered disfluencies.

Authors:  A Postma; H Kolk
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1993-06

10.  Phonological words and stuttering on function words.

Authors:  J Au-Yeung; P Howell; L Pilgrim
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  7 in total

1.  Facilities to assist people to research into stammered speech.

Authors:  Peter Howell; Mark Huckvale
Journal:  Stammering Res       Date:  2004-07-01

2.  Do individuals with fragile X syndrome show developmental stuttering or not? Comment on "Speech fluency in fragile X syndrome" by van Borsel, Dor and Rondal.

Authors:  Peter Howell
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.346

3.  Effects of delayed auditory feedback and frequency-shifted feedback on speech control and some potentials for future development of prosthetic aids for stammering.

Authors:  Peter Howell
Journal:  Stammering Res       Date:  2004-04-01

4.  Assessment of Some Contemporary Theories of Stuttering That Apply to Spontaneous Speech.

Authors:  Peter Howell
Journal:  Contemp Issues Commun Sci Disord       Date:  2004

Review 5.  Signs of developmental stuttering up to age eight and at 12 plus.

Authors:  Peter Howell
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-12-06

6.  Comparison of two ways of defining phonological words for assessing stuttering pattern changes with age in Spanish speakers who stutter.

Authors:  Peter Howell
Journal:  J Multiling Commun Disord       Date:  2004-11-01

7.  A model of serial order problems in fluent, stuttered and agrammatic speech.

Authors:  Peter Howell
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 2.161

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.