Literature DB >> 18267357

Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives, and associated cost.

Vittorio Corsetti1, Nehmat Houssami, Aurora Ferrari, Marco Ghirardi, Sergio Bellarosa, Osvaldo Angelini, Claudio Bani, Pasquale Sardo, Giuseppe Remida, Enzo Galligioni, Stefano Ciatto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the contribution of ultrasound (US) in detecting breast cancer in women with dense breasts and negative mammograms.
METHODS: 9157 (35.8%) of 25,572 self-referring women during 2000-2007 had BI-RADS D3-4 negative mammograms - all were screened with bilateral US.
RESULTS: US detected 37 cancers - incremental cancer detection rate (ICDR) was 0.40% (95% CI: 0.39-0.41%); ICDR was 0.33% in women <50 and 0.51% in those 50 years and older. US detected a larger proportion of cancers below age 50 compared to older women. US-only detected cancers had a more favourable stage (pTis-pT1a-pT1b: 64.8% versus 35.5%, p=0.001; pN1: 13.5% versus 31.3%, p=0.047) than cancers detected on mammography. US caused additional investigations in 4.9% of women and benign surgical biopsies in 0.9%. Cost per US-screened woman, and per US-detected cancer ranged between euro59-62 and euro14,618-15,234, respectively.
CONCLUSION: US detects early-stage cancers in women with mammography-negative dense breasts, with higher contribution in women younger than 50 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18267357     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  48 in total

1.  Interobserver agreement in breast radiological density attribution according to BI-RADS quantitative classification.

Authors:  D Bernardi; M Pellegrini; S Di Michele; P Tuttobene; C Fantò; M Valentini; M Gentilini; S Ciatto
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  Screening ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography in women with mammographically dense breasts.

Authors:  John R Scheel; Janie M Lee; Brian L Sprague; Christoph I Lee; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Diagnostic workup and costs of a single supplemental molecular breast imaging screen of mammographically dense breasts.

Authors:  Carrie B Hruska; Amy Lynn Conners; Katie N Jones; Michael K O'Connor; James P Moriarty; Judy C Boughey; Deborah J Rhodes
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Secondary prevention at 360°: the important role of diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  Anna Micaela Ciarrapico; Guglielmo Manenti; Chiara Pistolese; Sebastiano Fabiano; Roberto Fiori; Andrea Romagnoli; Gianluigi Sergiacomi; Matteo Stefanini; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  3D Supine Automated Ultrasound (SAUS, ABUS, ABVS) for Supplemental Screening Women with Dense Breasts.

Authors:  Alexander Mundinger
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2016-04-01

Review 6.  Applications of Advanced Breast Imaging Modalities.

Authors:  Arwa A Alzaghal; Pamela J DiPiro
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Interreader scoring variability in an observer study using dual-modality imaging for breast cancer detection in women with dense breasts.

Authors:  Karen Drukker; Karla J Horsch; Lorenzo L Pesce; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 8.  Breast cancer screening: review of benefits and harms, and recommendations for developing and low-income countries.

Authors:  Meteb Al-Foheidi; Mubarak M Al-Mansour; Ezzeldin M Ibrahim
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 9.  Supplementary screening sonography in mammographically dense breast: pros and cons.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Youk; Eun-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 10.  Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review.

Authors:  Monika Nothacker; Volker Duda; Markus Hahn; Mathias Warm; Friedrich Degenhardt; Helmut Madjar; Susanne Weinbrenner; Ute-Susann Albert
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.