Literature DB >> 28331733

3D Supine Automated Ultrasound (SAUS, ABUS, ABVS) for Supplemental Screening Women with Dense Breasts.

Alexander Mundinger1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 28331733      PMCID: PMC5351500          DOI: 10.5152/tjbh.2016.2940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Breast Health        ISSN: 1306-0945


× No keyword cloud information.
  34 in total

1.  Computer-aided detection of breast cancers using Haar-like features in automated 3D breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Tao Tan; Jan-Jurre Mordang; Jan van Zelst; André Grivegnée; Albert Gubern-Mérida; Jaime Melendez; Ritse M Mann; Wei Zhang; Bram Platel; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Evaluation of an automated breast 3D-ultrasound system by comparing it with hand-held ultrasound (HHUS) and mammography.

Authors:  Michael Golatta; Christina Baggs; Mirjam Schweitzer-Martin; Christoph Domschke; Sarah Schott; Aba Harcos; Alexander Scharf; Hans Junkermann; Geraldine Rauch; Joachim Rom; Christof Sohn; Joerg Heil
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Valerie A McCormack; Isabel dos Santos Silva
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  Will supplemental screening ultrasound increase breast cancer overdiagnosis?

Authors:  Virginia M Molleran
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Ultrasound as the Primary Screening Test for Breast Cancer: Analysis From ACRIN 6666.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Andriy I Bandos; Ellen B Mendelson; Daniel Lehrer; Roberta A Jong; Etta D Pisano
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Breast density measurements with ultrasound tomography: a comparison with film and digital mammography.

Authors:  Neb Duric; Norman Boyd; Peter Littrup; Mark Sak; Lukasz Myc; Cuiping Li; Erik West; Sal Minkin; Lisa Martin; Martin Yaffe; Steven Schmidt; Muhammad Faiz; Jason Shen; Olga Melnichouk; Qing Li; Teri Albrecht
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 7.  Mammographic breast density: impact on breast cancer risk and implications for screening.

Authors:  Phoebe E Freer
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  Real world performance of screening breast ultrasound following enactment of Connecticut Bill 458.

Authors:  Tchaiko Parris; Dorothy Wakefield; Heather Frimmer
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 2.431

9.  Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Jeffrey D Blume; Jean B Cormack; Ellen B Mendelson; Daniel Lehrer; Marcela Böhm-Vélez; Etta D Pisano; Roberta A Jong; W Phil Evans; Marilyn J Morton; Mary C Mahoney; Linda Hovanessian Larsen; Richard G Barr; Dione M Farria; Helga S Marques; Karan Boparai
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts.

Authors:  Kevin M Kelly; Judy Dean; W Scott Comulada; Sung-Jae Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  4 in total

1.  Wherein the authors attempt to minimize the confusion generated by their study "Breast cancer mortality after a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ" by several commentators who disagree with them and a few who don't: a qualitative study.

Authors:  S A Narod; H Ahmed; V Sopik
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  3D Automated Breast Ultrasound System: Comparison of Interpretation Time of Senior Versus Junior Radiologist.

Authors:  Aydan Arslan; Gökhan Ertaş; Erkin Arıbal
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2019-07-01

3.  SOFIA: A Novel Automated Breast Ultrasound System Used on Patients in the Prone Position: A Pilot Study on Lesion Detection in Comparison to Handheld Grayscale Ultrasound.

Authors:  André Farrokh; Harika Erdönmez; Fritz Schäfer; Nicolai Maass
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Supine versus Prone 3D Abus Accuracy in Breast Tumor Size Evaluation.

Authors:  Anna D'Angelo; Gianluca Gatta; Graziella Di Grezia; Sara Mercogliano; Francesca Ferrara; Charlotte Marguerite Lucille Trombadori; Antonio Franco; Alessandro Cina; Paolo Belli; Riccardo Manfredi
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-08-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.