Literature DB >> 1826733

Forgetting and the mirror effect in recognition memory: concentering of underlying distributions.

M Glanzer1, J K Adams, G Iverson.   

Abstract

The mirror effect is a strong regularity in recognition memory: If there are two conditions, A and B, with A giving higher recognition accuracy, then old items in A are recognized as old better than old items in B, and also new items in A are recognized as new better than new items in B. The mirror effect is explained by attention/likelihood theory, which also makes several new, counterintuitive predictions. One is that any variable, such as forgetting, that affects recognition changes the responses to new as well as old stimuli. In terms of underlying distributions, forgetting produces concentering, the bilateral movement of distributions, both new (noise) and old (signal), toward a midpoint. Data from two forced-choice experiments are reported that support the prediction of concentering and other predictions drawn from the theory. It is argued that current theories of memory, which are strength theories, cannot handle these regularities.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1826733     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.17.1.81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  10 in total

1.  Shades of the mirror effect: recognition of faces with and without sunglasses.

Authors:  W E Hockley; D H Hemsworth; A Consoli
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

2.  A reexamination of stimulus-frequency effects in recognition: two mirrors for low- and high-frequency pseudowords.

Authors:  Lynn M Reder; Paige Angstadt; Melanie Cary; Michael A Erickson; Michael S Ayers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The mirror effect and the spacing effect.

Authors:  Bennet Murdock
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

4.  Collaboration can improve individual recognition memory: evidence from immediate and delayed tests.

Authors:  Suparna Rajaram; Luciane P Pereira-Pasarin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-02

5.  Memorability judgments for high- and low-frequency words.

Authors:  R Guttentag; D Carroll
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-09

6.  Encoding, repetition, and the mirror effect in recognition memory: symmetry in motion.

Authors:  A Hilford; M Glanzer; K Kim
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-09

Review 7.  Three regularities of recognition memory: the role of bias.

Authors:  Andrew Hilford; Laurence T Maloney; Murray Glanzer; Kisok Kim
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

8.  Reflections of the mirror effect for item and associative recognition.

Authors:  W E Hockley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-11

9.  Recognition of familiar and unfamiliar melodies in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  J C Barlett; A R Halpern; W J Dowling
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-09

10.  The word-frequency paradox for recall/recognition occurs for pictures.

Authors:  Paul Johan Karlsen; Joan Gay Snodgrass
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-06-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.