Literature DB >> 17546737

Collaboration can improve individual recognition memory: evidence from immediate and delayed tests.

Suparna Rajaram1, Luciane P Pereira-Pasarin.   

Abstract

In two experiments, we tested the effects of collaboration on individual recognition memory. In Experiment 1, participants studied pictures and words either for meaning or for surface properties and made recognition memory judgments individually either following group discussion among 3 members (collaborative condition) or in the absence of discussion (noncollaborative condition). Levels of processing and picture superiority effects were replicated, and collaboration significantly increased individual recognition memory. Experiment 2 replicated this positive effect and showed that even though memory sensitivity declined at longer delays (48 h and 1 week), collaboration continued to exert a positive influence. These findings show that (1) consensus is not necessary for producing benefits of collaboration on individual recognition, (2) collaborative facilitation on individual memory is robust, and (3) collaboration enhances individual memory further if conditions predispose individual accuracy in the absence of collaboration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17546737     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  11 in total

1.  Group collaboration in recognition memory.

Authors:  S E Clark; A Hori; A Putnam; T P Martin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Social contagion of memory.

Authors:  H L Roediger; M L Meade; E T Bergman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

3.  The effects of conformity on recognition judgements.

Authors:  Matthew B Reysen
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2005-01

4.  Forgetting and the mirror effect in recognition memory: concentering of underlying distributions.

Authors:  M Glanzer; J K Adams; G Iverson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Collective memory: collaborative and individual processes in remembering.

Authors:  Mary Susan Weldon; Krystal D Bellinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  A comparison of group and individual remembering: does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies?

Authors:  B H Basden; D R Basden; S Bryner; R L Thomas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Functional aspects of recollective experience.

Authors:  J M Gardiner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-07

8.  Remembering and knowing: two means of access to the personal past.

Authors:  S Rajaram
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-01

9.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

10.  Collaborative inhibition is due to the product, not the process, of recalling in groups.

Authors:  Daniel B Wright; Adriane Klumpp
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12
View more
  13 in total

1.  Collaboration in implicit memory: evidence from word-fragment completion and category exemplar generation.

Authors:  Clelia Rossi-Arnaud; Vincenzo Cestari; Valeria Rezende Silva Marques; Giulia Bechi Gabrielli; Pietro Spataro
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-11-26

2.  False memory for associated word lists in individuals and collaborating groups.

Authors:  Ruth H Maki; Arne Weigold; Abbigail Arellano
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04

3.  Age differences in collaborative memory: the role of retrieval manipulations.

Authors:  Michelle L Meade; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-10

4.  Why two heads apart are better than two heads together: multiple mechanisms underlie the collaborative inhibition effect in memory.

Authors:  Sarah J Barber; Celia B Harris; Suparna Rajaram
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Short-term and long-term collaboration benefits on individual recall in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Helena M Blumen; Yaakov Stern
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-01

6.  Collaborative memory and part-set cueing impairments: the role of executive depletion in modulating retrieval disruption.

Authors:  Sarah J Barber; Suparna Rajaram
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2011-05

7.  When two is too many: Collaborative encoding impairs memory.

Authors:  Sarah J Barber; Suparna Rajaram; Arthur Aron
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-04

8.  Younger and older adults' collaborative recall of shared and unshared emotional pictures.

Authors:  Sarah J Barber; Jaime J Castrellon; Philipp Opitz; Mara Mather
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-07

9.  Social processing improves recall performance.

Authors:  Matthew B Reysen; Stephan A Adair
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

10.  Conflict and metacognitive control: the mismatch-monitoring hypothesis of how others' knowledge states affect recall.

Authors:  Scott H Fraundorf; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2015-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.