Literature DB >> 12827353

The word-frequency paradox for recall/recognition occurs for pictures.

Paul Johan Karlsen1, Joan Gay Snodgrass.   

Abstract

A yes-no recognition task and two recall tasks were conducted using pictures of high and low familiarity ratings. Picture familiarity had analogous effects to word frequency, and replicated the word-frequency paradox in recall and recognition. Low-familiarity pictures were more recognizable than high-familiarity pictures, pure lists of high-familiarity pictures were more recallable than pure lists of low-familiarity pictures, and there was no effect of familiarity for mixed lists. These results are consistent with the predictions of the Search of Associative Memory (SAM) model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12827353     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-003-0138-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  16 in total

1.  The influence of word frequency on recency effects in directed free recall.

Authors:  James P Van Overschelde
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  The immediate retention of unrelated words.

Authors:  B B MURDOCK
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1960-10

3.  Recognition memory for nouns as a function of abstractness and frequency.

Authors:  A M GORMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1961-01

4.  Using overt rehearsals to explain word frequency effects in free recall.

Authors:  Geoff Ward; Graham Woodward; Anna Stevens; Clare Stinson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Forgetting and the mirror effect in recognition memory: concentering of underlying distributions.

Authors:  M Glanzer; J K Adams; G Iverson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  The mirror effect in recognition memory: data and theory.

Authors:  M Glanzer; J K Adams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; J Corwin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-03

8.  Temporal contrast and the word frequency effect.

Authors:  R B May; L J Cuddy; J M Norton
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1979-09

9.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

10.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.

Authors:  G Gillund; R M Shiffrin
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  3 in total

1.  Modulating the phonological similarity effect: the contribution of interlist similarity and lexicality.

Authors:  Paul Johan Karlsen; Arild Lian
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-04

2.  Memory for objects in canonical and noncanonical viewpoints.

Authors:  Pablo Gomez; Jennifer Shutter; Jeffrey N Rouder
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-10

3.  Examining the role of context variability in memory for items and associations.

Authors:  William R Aue; Jessica M Fontaine; Amy H Criss
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.