Literature DB >> 18265836

Gaze behaviour in audiovisual speech perception: asymmetrical distribution of face-directed fixations.

Ian T Everdell1, Heidi O Marsh, Micheal D Yurick, Kevin G Munhall, Martin Paré.   

Abstract

Speech perception under natural conditions entails integration of auditory and visual information. Understanding how visual and auditory speech information are integrated requires detailed descriptions of the nature and processing of visual speech information. To understand better the process of gathering visual information, we studied the distribution of face-directed fixations of humans performing an audiovisual speech perception task to characterise the degree of asymmetrical viewing and its relationship to speech intelligibility. Participants showed stronger gaze fixation asymmetries while viewing dynamic faces, compared to static faces or face-like objects, especially when gaze was directed to the talkers' eyes. Although speech perception accuracy was significantly enhanced by the viewing of congruent, dynamic faces, we found no correlation between task performance and gaze fixation asymmetry. Most participants preferentially fixated the right side of the faces and their preferences persisted while viewing horizontally mirrored stimuli, different talkers, or static faces. These results suggest that the asymmetrical distributions of gaze fixations reflect the participants' viewing preferences, rather than being a product of asymmetrical faces, but that this behavioural bias does not predict correct audiovisual speech perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18265836     DOI: 10.1068/p5852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  21 in total

1.  Initial eye movements during face identification are optimal and similar across cultures.

Authors:  Charles C-F Or; Matthew F Peterson; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  The effect of varying talker identity and listening conditions on gaze behavior during audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Julie N Buchan; Martin Paré; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Natural, but not artificial, facial movements elicit the left visual field bias in infant face scanning.

Authors:  Naiqi G Xiao; Paul C Quinn; Andrea Wheeler; Olivier Pascalis; Kang Lee
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  The left-side bias is not unique to own-race face processing.

Authors:  Chenglin Li; Zhiguo Wang; Hui Bao; Jianping Wang; Shuang Chen; Xiaohua Cao
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Spatial Frequency Requirements and Gaze Strategy in Visual-Only and Audiovisual Speech Perception.

Authors:  Amanda H Wilson; Agnès Alsius; Martin Paré; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Asymmetries in unimodal visual vowel perception: The roles of oral-facial kinematics, orientation, and configuration.

Authors:  Matthew Masapollo; Linda Polka; Lucie Ménard; Lauren Franklin; Mark Tiede; James Morgan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Fixating the eyes of a speaker provides sufficient visual information to modulate early auditory processing.

Authors:  Elina Kaplan; Alexandra Jesse
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 3.251

8.  Fixation patterns during recognition of personally familiar and unfamiliar faces.

Authors:  Goedele van Belle; Meike Ramon; Philippe Lefèvre; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-06-17

9.  Characteristic visuomotor influences on eye-movement patterns to faces and other high level stimuli.

Authors:  Joseph M Arizpe; Vincent Walsh; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-29

10.  The Importance of Networking in Autism Gaze Analysis.

Authors:  Quentin Guillon; Mohammad H Afzali; Bernadette Rogé; Sophie Baduel; Jeanne Kruck; Nouchine Hadjikhani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.