Literature DB >> 27537379

Spatial Frequency Requirements and Gaze Strategy in Visual-Only and Audiovisual Speech Perception.

Amanda H Wilson, Agnès Alsius, Martin Paré, Kevin G Munhall.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this article is to examine the effects of visual image degradation on performance and gaze behavior in audiovisual and visual-only speech perception tasks.
METHOD: We presented vowel-consonant-vowel utterances visually filtered at a range of frequencies in visual-only, audiovisual congruent, and audiovisual incongruent conditions (Experiment 1; N = 66). In Experiment 2 (N = 20), participants performed a visual-only speech perception task and in Experiment 3 (N = 20) an audiovisual task while having their gaze behavior monitored using eye-tracking equipment.
RESULTS: In the visual-only condition, increasing image resolution led to monotonic increases in performance, and proficient speechreaders were more affected by the removal of high spatial information than were poor speechreaders. The McGurk effect also increased with increasing visual resolution, although it was less affected by the removal of high-frequency information. Observers tended to fixate on the mouth more in visual-only perception, but gaze toward the mouth did not correlate with accuracy of silent speechreading or the magnitude of the McGurk effect.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that individual differences in silent speechreading and the McGurk effect are not related. This conclusion is supported by differential influences of high-resolution visual information on the 2 tasks and differences in the pattern of gaze.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27537379      PMCID: PMC5280058          DOI: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-15-0092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  43 in total

1.  Hearing by eye: how much spatial degradation can be tolerated?

Authors:  J MacDonald; S Andersen; T Bachmann
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 2.  Lipreading and audio-visual speech perception.

Authors:  Q Summerfield
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1992-01-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The effect of a concurrent working memory task and temporal offsets on the integration of auditory and visual speech information.

Authors:  Julie N Buchan; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  Seeing Perceiving       Date:  2012

4.  The effects of blurred vision on auditory-visual speech perception in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Isabelle Legault; Jean-Pierre Gagné; Wafaa Rhoualem; Penny Anderson-Gosselin
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Spatial statistics of gaze fixations during dynamic face processing.

Authors:  Julie N Buchan; Martin Paré; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.083

6.  NORMAL "VISUAL HEARING".

Authors:  J C Cotton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1935-12-20       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Face-viewing patterns in young children with autism spectrum disorders: speaking up for the role of language comprehension.

Authors:  Jakob Asberg Johnels; Christopher Gillberg; Terje Falck-Ytter; Carmela Miniscalco
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Point-light facial displays enhance comprehension of speech in noise.

Authors:  L D Rosenblum; J A Johnson; H M Saldaña
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1996-12

9.  Auditory-visual speech perception and aging.

Authors:  Kathleen M Cienkowski; Arlene Earley Carney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Effects of distance on the visual reception of speech.

Authors:  N P Erber
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1971-12
View more
  4 in total

1.  Rethinking the McGurk effect as a perceptual illusion.

Authors:  Laura M Getz; Joseph C Toscano
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Audiovisual integration as conflict resolution: The conflict of the McGurk illusion.

Authors:  Luis Morís Fernández; Emiliano Macaluso; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Fixating the eyes of a speaker provides sufficient visual information to modulate early auditory processing.

Authors:  Elina Kaplan; Alexandra Jesse
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 3.251

Review 4.  How does gaze to faces support face-to-face interaction? A review and perspective.

Authors:  Roy S Hessels
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.