Literature DB >> 1826325

Stimulus discrimination following covert attentional orienting to an exogenous cue.

J M Henderson1.   

Abstract

Five experiments explored exogenous covert visual-attentional orienting following a brief peripheral cue. On each trial an attentional cue was followed by a stimulus in an empty field at 1 of 8 locations on an imaginary circle centered on the fixation point. The cued area size and the cue-target spatial relation were manipulated. Accuracy and response time were affected by the exogenous cue validity. Attention was allocated to a specific location in a visual quadrant: A target at an uncued location in a quadrant was not facilitated as much as target at the cued location, and a target in a different quadrant was inhibited in relation to a neutral condition. Cuing 2 locations in a quadrant was not as facilitative for targets at the cued locations or as inhibitive for targets at other locations compared with cuing a single location in a quadrant. Results are discussed in the context of several extent models of covert visual-spatial attention.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1826325     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.17.1.91

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  22 in total

1.  Cued visual attention does not distinguish between occluded and occluding objects.

Authors:  C Haimson; M Behrmann
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

2.  Change detection in the flicker paradigm: the role of fixation position within the scene.

Authors:  A Hollingworth; G Schrock; J M Henderson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-03

3.  Does attention impair temporal discrimination? Examining non-attentional accounts.

Authors:  Bettina Rolke; Angela Dinkelbach; Elisabeth Hein; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-09-26

4.  Cueing effects on semantic and perceptual categorization: ERPs reveal differential effects of validity as a function of processing stage.

Authors:  Grace Lai; Jennifer A Mangels
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Anticipatory suppression of nonattended locations in visual cortex marks target location and predicts perception.

Authors:  Chad M Sylvester; Anthony I Jack; Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Functional distinction between visuomovement and movement neurons in macaque frontal eye field during saccade countermanding.

Authors:  Supriya Ray; Pierre Pouget; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Spatial distribution of visual attention: perceptual sensitivity and response latency.

Authors:  T C Handy; A Kingstone; G R Mangun
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-05

8.  Endogenous visuospatial precuing effects as a function of age and task demands.

Authors:  D J Tellinghuisen; L D Zimba; D A Robin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-08

9.  Temporal uncertainty degrades perceptual processing.

Authors:  Bettina Rolke; Peter Hofmann
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-06

10.  Visual and motor connectivity and the distribution of calcium-binding proteins in macaque frontal eye field: implications for saccade target selection.

Authors:  Pierre Pouget; Iwona Stepniewska; Erin A Crowder; Melanie W Leslie; Erik E Emeric; Matthew J Nelson; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 3.856

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.