Literature DB >> 17382975

Cueing effects on semantic and perceptual categorization: ERPs reveal differential effects of validity as a function of processing stage.

Grace Lai1, Jennifer A Mangels.   

Abstract

Valid cueing has been shown to accelerate target identification and improve decision accuracy. However, the precise nature and extent to which biasing influences the successive stages of target processing remain unclear. The present event-related potential (ERP) study used a "hybrid" task that combined features of standard cued-attention and task-switching paradigms in order to explore the effects of expectation on both identification and categorization of centrally presented stimuli. Subjects made semantic judgments (living/nonliving) on word targets ("bunny"), and perceptual judgments (right/left) on arrow targets ("<<<<<"). Target expectancy was manipulated using cues that were valid (60 percent of trials), invalid (10 percent), or neutral (30 percent). Invalidly cued targets required task-set switching before categorization could commence, and resulted in RT costs relative to validly or neutrally cued targets. Additional benefits from valid-cueing were only observed for word targets. Invalid cueing of both arrow and word targets modulated early posterior visual potentials (P1/N1) and elicited a subsequent anterior P3a (270 ms). The temporal relationship of these effects suggests that the P3a indexed domain-general task-set switching processes recruited in response to the detection of unexpected perceptual information. Subsequent to the P3a and immediately preceding the behavioral response, validly cued targets elicited enhanced stimulus-specific waveforms (arrows: parietal positivity [P290], words: inferior temporal negativity [late ITN: 400-600 ms]). The degree of neural enhancement relative to the invalid and neutral conditions mirrored the magnitude of corresponding RT benefits, suggesting that these waveforms indexed categorization, decision processes or both. Together, these results suggest that valid cueing increases the neural efficiency of initial stimulus identification, facilitating transmission of information to subsequent categorization stages, where increased neural activity leads to behavioral benefits.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17382975      PMCID: PMC2099310          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  55 in total

1.  The anatomy and time course of semantic priming investigated by fMRI and ERPs.

Authors:  Susan L Rossell; Cathy J Price; A Christina Nobre
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Who comes first? The role of the prefrontal and parietal cortex in cognitive control.

Authors:  Marcel Brass; Markus Ullsperger; Thomas R Knoesche; D Yves von Cramon; Natalie A Phillips
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Neural localization of semantic context effects in electromagnetic and hemodynamic studies.

Authors:  Cyma Van Petten; Barbara J Luka
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 4.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; L Anllo-Vento
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Effects of target luminance and cue validity on the latency of visual detection.

Authors:  H L Hawkins; M G Shafto; K Richardson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-11

6.  Language-related field potentials in the anterior-medial temporal lobe: I. Intracranial distribution and neural generators.

Authors:  G McCarthy; A C Nobre; S Bentin; D D Spencer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.

Authors:  M Kutas; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

9.  Interactions between spatial attention and global/local feature selection: an ERP study.

Authors:  S Han; W Liu; E W Yund; D L Woods
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-08-21       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  Word recognition in the human inferior temporal lobe.

Authors:  A C Nobre; T Allison; G McCarthy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-11-17       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  7 in total

1.  Brain oscillatory activity associated with task switching and feedback processing.

Authors:  Toni Cunillera; Lluís Fuentemilla; Jose Periañez; Josep Marco-Pallarès; Ulrike M Krämer; Estela Càmara; Thomas F Münte; Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Effects of verbal event structure on online thematic role assignment.

Authors:  Evie Malaia; Ronnie B Wilbur; Christine Weber-Fox
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2012-10

3.  Precueing imminent conflict does not override sequence-dependent interference adaptation.

Authors:  Gamze Alpay; Monique Goerke; Birgit Stürmer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11-26

4.  Neural bases of syntax-semantics interface processing.

Authors:  Evguenia Malaia; Sharlene Newman
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 5.082

5.  Signal enhancement and suppression during visual-spatial selective attention.

Authors:  J W Couperus; G R Mangun
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Anticipation of natural stimuli modulates EEG dynamics: physiology and simulation.

Authors:  Ingo Fründ; Jeanette Schadow; Niko A Busch; Nicole Naue; Ursula Körner; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 5.082

7.  (No) time for control: Frontal theta dynamics reveal the cost of temporally guided conflict anticipation.

Authors:  Joram van Driel; Jennifer C Swart; Tobias Egner; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Michael X Cohen
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.282

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.