Literature DB >> 8729926

Fluency effect of frequency alterations of plus/minus one-half and one-quarter octave shifts in auditory feedback of people who stutter.

A Stuart1, J Kalinowski, J Armson, R Stenstrom, K Jones.   

Abstract

The effect of frequency alterations in auditory feedback of people who stutter on stuttering frequency was investigated. Twelve participants who stutter read aloud under nonaltered auditory feedback (NAF) and four conditions of frequency-altered feedback ([FAF], plus/minus one-half and one-quarter octaves) at normal and fast speech rates. Stuttering frequency was significantly higher while reading aloud with NAF relative to the four conditions of FAF (p < 0.05). There were no differences among participants' stuttering frequency between the four FAF conditions (p > 0.05). Reductions in stuttering frequency of approximately 50% to 60% were found with FAF relative to NAF. More disfluencies occurred with the fast versus the normal speech rate condition (p = .0007) irrespective of auditory feedback condition. These findings suggest that slight alterations in the frequency of auditory feedback of people who stutter are fluency-enhancing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8729926     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3902.396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  9 in total

1.  Dynamics of self-monitoring and error detection in speech production: evidence from mental imagery and MEG.

Authors:  Xing Tian; David Poeppel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Auditory Masking Effects on Speech Fluency in Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia: Comparison to Altered Auditory Feedback.

Authors:  Adam Jacks; Katarina L Haley
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Speech Rate Modification and Its Effects on Fluency Reversal in Fluent Speakers and People Who Stutter.

Authors:  Peter Howell; Stevie Sackin
Journal:  J Dev Phys Disabil       Date:  2000-12-01

4.  Strength of German accent under altered auditory feedback.

Authors:  P Howell; K Dworzynski
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-04

5.  Immediate speech fluency improvement after application of the Digital Speech Aid in stuttering patients.

Authors:  Joanna Ratyńska; Agata Szkiełkowska; Renata Markowska; Marek Kurkowski; Marzena Mularzuk; Henryk Skarżyński
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2012-01

Review 6.  The Role of Rhythm in Speech and Language Rehabilitation: The SEP Hypothesis.

Authors:  Shinya Fujii; Catherine Y Wan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  A review of brain circuitries involved in stuttering.

Authors:  Anna Craig-McQuaide; Harith Akram; Ludvic Zrinzo; Elina Tripoliti
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Suggestions for improving the long-term effects of treatments for stuttering: A Review and synthesis of frequency-shifted feedback and operant techniques.

Authors:  Phil Reed; Peter Howell
Journal:  Eur J Behav Anal       Date:  2000-01-01

9.  Weak responses to auditory feedback perturbation during articulation in persons who stutter: evidence for abnormal auditory-motor transformation.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Deryk S Beal; Satrajit S Ghosh; Mark K Tiede; Frank H Guenther; Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.