| Literature DB >> 18256736 |
Yujie Lv1, Jie Tian, Wenxiang Cong, Ge Wang.
Abstract
To verify the influence of a priori information on the nonuniqueness problem of bioluminescence tomography (BLT), the multimodality imaging fusion based BLT experiment is performed by multiview noncontact detection mode, which incorporates the anatomical information obtained by the microCT scanner and the background optical properties based on diffuse reflectance measurements. In the reconstruction procedure, the utilization of adaptive finite element methods (FEMs) and a priori permissible source region refines the reconstructed results and improves numerical robustness and efficiency. The comparison between the absence and employment of a priori information shows that multimodality imaging fusion is essential to quantitative BLT reconstruction.Entities:
Year: 2007 PMID: 18256736 PMCID: PMC2211423 DOI: 10.1155/2007/86741
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biomed Imaging ISSN: 1687-4188
Figure 1BLT system and physical phantom. (a) Multiview noncontact BLT prototype; (b) the physical heterogeneous phantom consisting of bone (B), heart (H), lungs (L), and muscle (M); and (c) a slice scanned by microCT scanner.
Optical properties of the physical heterogeneous phantom.
| Material | Muscle | Lung | Heart | Bone |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.007 | 0.023 | 0.011 | 0.001 |
|
| 1.031 | 2.000 | 1.096 | 0.060 |
Figure 2Schematic diagram of the multipleview bioluminescence imaging experiment.
Figure 3The detected photon energy distribution on the phantom surface by CCD camera.
Figure 4The initial homogeneous (a) and heterogeneous (b) finite element meshes used in the BLT reconstruction. The black areas represent a priori permissible source regions.
Figure 5Comparison between the actual and reconstructed sources. (a) The BLT reconstruction without anatomical and optical information; (b) the counterpart only with anatomical information; and (c) that with anatomical and optical information.
Quantitative comparison between the reconstructed and actual sources with and without a priori anatomical and optical information. Density errors are calculated by .
| No. | Recons. pos. | Recons. dens. | Pos./dens. |
|---|---|---|---|
| (mm) | (nW/mm3) | errors | |
| 1 | (−6.39,0.39,1.31) | 168.80 | N.A. |
| 2 | (−5.83,2.85,−0.09) | 143.69 | 3.45/7.61 |
| (−6.05,-1.31,0.10) | 177.26 | 2.96/0.69 | |
| 3 | (−9.40,1.31,−0.26) | 167.49 | 0.51/7.69 |
| (−8.11,−1.76,0.24) | 175.74 | 0.96/1.54 |