Literature DB >> 18251019

A computational neuroanatomy for motor control.

Reza Shadmehr1, John W Krakauer.   

Abstract

The study of patients to infer normal brain function has a long tradition in neurology and psychology. More recently, the motor system has been subject to quantitative and computational characterization. The purpose of this review is to argue that the lesion approach and theoretical motor control can mutually inform each other. Specifically, one may identify distinct motor control processes from computational models and map them onto specific deficits in patients. Here we review some of the impairments in motor control, motor learning and higher-order motor control in patients with lesions of the corticospinal tract, the cerebellum, parietal cortex, the basal ganglia, and the medial temporal lobe. We attempt to explain some of these impairments in terms of computational ideas such as state estimation, optimization, prediction, cost, and reward. We suggest that a function of the cerebellum is system identification: to build internal models that predict sensory outcome of motor commands and correct motor commands through internal feedback. A function of the parietal cortex is state estimation: to integrate the predicted proprioceptive and visual outcomes with sensory feedback to form a belief about how the commands affected the states of the body and the environment. A function of basal ganglia is related to optimal control: learning costs and rewards associated with sensory states and estimating the "cost-to-go" during execution of a motor task. Finally, functions of the primary and the premotor cortices are related to implementing the optimal control policy by transforming beliefs about proprioceptive and visual states, respectively, into motor commands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18251019      PMCID: PMC2553854          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1280-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  87 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Extent of compensation for variations in monkey saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  C Quaia; M Paré; R H Wurtz; L M Optican
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Macaque ventral premotor cortex exerts powerful facilitation of motor cortex outputs to upper limb motoneurons.

Authors:  H Shimazu; M A Maier; G Cerri; P A Kirkwood; R N Lemon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Internal models in the cerebellum.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; R C Miall; M Kawato
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Corollary discharge provides accurate eye position information to the oculomotor system.

Authors:  B L Guthrie; J D Porter; D L Sparks
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The mental representation of hand movements after parietal cortex damage.

Authors:  A Sirigu; J R Duhamel; L Cohen; B Pillon; B Dubois; Y Agid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-09-13       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Optic ataxia: a specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects.

Authors:  M T Perenin; A Vighetto
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  358 in total

1.  Flexible, task-dependent use of sensory feedback to control hand movements.

Authors:  David C Knill; Amulya Bondada; Manu Chhabra
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Computational neuroanatomy of speech production.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  How does the motor system correct for errors in time and space during locomotor adaptation?

Authors:  Laura A Malone; Amy J Bastian; Gelsy Torres-Oviedo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Ventral and dorsal fiber systems for imagined and executed movement.

Authors:  Magnus-Sebastian Vry; Dorothee Saur; Michel Rijntjes; Roza Umarova; Philipp Kellmeyer; Susanne Schnell; Volkmar Glauche; Farsin Hamzei; Cornelius Weiller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Optimal feedback control and the long-latency stretch response.

Authors:  J Andrew Pruszynski; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Dissociating the roles of the cerebellum and motor cortex during adaptive learning: the motor cortex retains what the cerebellum learns.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Alejandro Vazquez; Neel Pasricha; Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Contributions of the motor cortex to adaptive control of reaching depend on the perturbation schedule.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Sarah E Criscimagna-Hemminger; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Reorganization of finger coordination patterns during adaptation to rotation and scaling of a newly learned sensorimotor transformation.

Authors:  Xiaolin Liu; Kristine M Mosier; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Maura Casadio; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Proprioceptive feedback and preferred patterns of human movement.

Authors:  Jesse C Dean
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.230

10.  Predicting and correcting ataxia using a model of cerebellar function.

Authors:  Nasir H Bhanpuri; Allison M Okamura; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 13.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.