Literature DB >> 18243202

Functional results of angular-stable plate fixation in displaced proximal humeral fractures.

Alexander E Handschin1, Markus Cardell, Claudio Contaldo, Otmar Trentz, Guido A Wanner.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The availability of angular-stable plate/screw systems led to a euphoric use of these implants for the treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures. The high implant costs seem to be justified by a potentially improved outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty one patients (20 female, 11 male, mean age: 62+/-16 years) with two-, three- and four-part proximal humerus fractures (Neer classification) were operated using the proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS). The mean follow-up time was 19+/-3 postoperative months (range: 340-720 days). Functional results (Constant score, UCLA-score) were analysed and compared to an equivalent historic control group of 60 patients operated for the same fracture types using two one-third tubular plates. Additionally, total implant costs for each technique were compared.
RESULTS: Complications in the PHILOS group included one implant failure with refracture, one secondary dislocation, two cases of subacromial impingement, and two cases of partial avascular necrosis of the humeral head. The mean Constant score (age- and sex-matched) was 80+/-11% for the affected side and 104+/-13% for the healthy side. The UCLA scores were excellent in 10%, good in 67%, and fair in 23% of the patients. Complication rate and functional results did not differ significantly from the control group treated with one-third tubular plates. Implant costs were significantly higher for the PHILOS group (684+/-40 Euro vs. 158+/-20 Euro, p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Our study showed similar functional results using either plate. Although the PHILOS plate may provide important advantages in specific situations, such as osteoporotic bone, its use as a standard must be carefully judged under the economic aspect of the significant higher implant costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18243202     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  22 in total

1.  Surgical treatment of Neer Group VI proximal humeral fractures: retrospective comparison of PHILOS® and hemiarthroplasty.

Authors:  Christian Spross; Andreas Platz; Matthias Erschbamer; Thomas Lattmann; Michael Dietrich
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Challenging the dogma on inferiority of stainless steel implants for fracture fixation. An end of the controversy?].

Authors:  S Weckbach; J T Losacco; J Hahnhaussen; F Gebhard; P F Stahel
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Complex fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly--outcome and complications after locking plate fixation.

Authors:  B Schliemann; J Siemoneit; Ch Theisen; C Kösters; A Weimann; M J Raschke
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2012-05

4.  Can the osteosynthesis with locking plates be a better treatment for unstable fractures of the proximal humerus?

Authors:  M A Verdano; E Lunini; A Pellegrini; T Corsini; P Marenghi; F Ceccarelli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2013-06-08

5.  Locking and Non-locking Constructs Achieve Similar Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes for Internal Fixation of Intra-articular Distal Humerus Fractures.

Authors:  Marschall Berkes; Grant Garrigues; John Solic; Nathan Van Zeeland; Nader Shourbaji; Kim Brouwer; Jesse Jupiter; David Ruch; William T Obremskey
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2011-09-15

6.  Is Arthroscopic Technique Superior to Open Reduction Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Isolated Displaced Greater Tuberosity Fractures?

Authors:  Weixiong Liao; Hao Zhang; Zhongli Li; Ji Li
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Three- and four-part fractures have poorer function than one-part proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Crispin Ong; Christopher Bechtel; Michael Walsh; Joseph D Zuckerman; Kenneth A Egol
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Plating of proximal fracture of the humerus: a study of 30 cases.

Authors:  C Iacobellis; K Fountzoulas; R Aldegheri
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2011-03-04

9.  The role of locking technology in the upper extremity.

Authors:  Siddharth B Joglekar; Asif M Ilyas
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2010-01-08

10.  Treatment for displaced proximal humerus fractures: comparison of interlocking plate fixation versus minimal invasive techniques.

Authors:  Felix Bachelier; Antonius Pizanis; Julia Schwitalla; Tim Pohlemann; Dieter Kohn; Reiner Wirbel
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.