Literature DB >> 21605626

Visuo-motor gain adaptation and generalization following left hemisphere stroke.

Richard Palluel-Germain1, Steven A Jax, Laurel J Buxbaum.   

Abstract

During gain adaptation, participants must learn to adapt to novel visuo-motor mappings in which the movement amplitudes they produce do not match the visual feedback they receive. The aim of the present study was to investigate the neural substrates of gain adaptation by examining its possible disruption following left hemisphere stroke. Thirteen chronic left hemisphere stroke patients and five healthy right-handed control subjects completed three experimental phases involving reaching with the left hand, which was the less-affected hand in patients. First, participants reached without visual feedback to six different target locations (baseline phase). Next, in the adaptation phase, participants executed movements to one target under conditions in which the perceived movement distance was 70% of the produced movement distance. Last, in order to test the generalization of this new visuomotor mapping, participants made movements without visual feedback to untrained target locations (generalization phase). Significant between-patient differences were observed during adaptation. Lesion analyses indicated that these between-patient differences were predicted by the amount of damage to the supramarginal gyrus (Brodmann area 40). In addition, patients performed more poorly than controls in the generalization phase, suggesting that different processes are involved in adaptation and generalization periods.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21605626      PMCID: PMC3119783          DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  25 in total

1.  The role of proprioception and attention in a visuomotor adaptation task.

Authors:  H A Ingram; P van Donkelaar; J Cole; J L Vercher; G M Gauthier; R C Miall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; Z M Pine; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping.

Authors:  Elizabeth Bates; Stephen M Wilson; Ayse Pinar Saygin; Frederic Dick; Martin I Sereno; Robert T Knight; Nina F Dronkers
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Altering the visuomotor gain. Evidence that motor plans deal with vector quantities.

Authors:  Philippe Vindras; Paolo Viviani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-10-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Differential cortical and subcortical activations in learning rotations and gains for reaching: a PET study.

Authors:  John W Krakauer; Maria-Felice Ghilardi; Marc Mentis; Anna Barnes; Milana Veytsman; David Eidelberg; Claude Ghez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Implicit and explicit components of dual adaptation to visuomotor rotations.

Authors:  Mathias Hegele; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2010-12

7.  Neural representations of skilled movement.

Authors:  K Y Haaland; D L Harrington; R T Knight
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 8.  Ideomotor apraxia: a call to action.

Authors:  L J Buxbaum
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 0.881

Review 9.  Using human brain lesions to infer function: a relic from a past era in the fMRI age?

Authors:  Chris Rorden; Hans-Otto Karnath
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Adaptation of aimed arm movements to sensorimotor discordance: evidence for direction-independent gain control.

Authors:  O Bock
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1992-10-31       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The effects of brain lateralization on motor control and adaptation.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Kathleen Y Haaland; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Spasticity may obscure motor learning ability after stroke.

Authors:  Sandeep K Subramanian; Anatol G Feldman; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Visuomotor gain distortion alters online motor performance and enhances primary motor cortex excitability in patients with stroke.

Authors:  Hamid F Bagce; Soha Saleh; Sergei V Adamovich; Eugene Tunik
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2012-06-01

4.  Dual-tDCS Enhances Online Motor Skill Learning and Long-Term Retention in Chronic Stroke Patients.

Authors:  S Lefebvre; P Laloux; A Peeters; P Desfontaines; J Jamart; Y Vandermeeren
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Effects of continuous visual feedback during sitting balance training in chronic stroke survivors.

Authors:  Laura Pellegrino; Psiche Giannoni; Lucio Marinelli; Maura Casadio
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Distortion of Visuo-Motor Temporal Integration in Apraxia: Evidence From Delayed Visual Feedback Detection Tasks and Voxel-Based Lesion-Symptom Mapping.

Authors:  Satoshi Nobusako; Rintaro Ishibashi; Yusaku Takamura; Emika Oda; Yukie Tanigashira; Masashi Kouno; Takanori Tominaga; Yurie Ishibashi; Hiroyuki Okuno; Kaori Nobusako; Takuro Zama; Michihiro Osumi; Sotaro Shimada; Shu Morioka
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 4.003

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.