Literature DB >> 10879948

Relating middle-ear acoustic performance to body size in the cat family: measurements and models.

G T Huang1, J J Rosowski, W T Peake.   

Abstract

Is the acoustic performance of the mammalian middle ear dependent on body size? We focus on the cat family, because of its qualitatively uniform (and distinctive) middle-ear structure, large size range, and the extensive data available from domestic cats which provide a framework for relating middle-ear acoustics to structure. We report measurements of acoustic admittance in 17 live adult ears of 11 exotic species, ranging in size from sand cat (3 kg) to tiger (180 kg). For low frequencies, the middle-ear response is compliant for all species and generally increases with size. The compliance of the middle-ear air space increases with size, but the compliance of the tympanic membrane and ossicular chain is not correlated with size. Structure-based rules are developed to represent some features of middle-ear performance: (1) low-frequency sensitivity increases with size; and (2) the frequency of a prominent notch in admittance decreases with size. Although some species deviate from the rules, the data generally support the idea that in larger felids the middle-ear response is shifted to lower frequencies. Thus, in the cat family, body size partly describes variations in auditory features. More speculatively, ethological pressures which might influence hearing performance are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10879948     DOI: 10.1007/s003590050444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  10 in total

1.  Probing cochlear tuning and tonotopy in the tiger using otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Edward J Walsh; JoAnn McGee; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Structures that contribute to middle-ear admittance in chinchilla.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Michael E Ravicz; Jocelyn E Songer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Finite element modeling of acousto-mechanical coupling in the cat middle ear.

Authors:  James P Tuck-Lee; Peter M Pinsky; Charles R Steele; Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Restoration of middle-ear input in fluid-filled middle ears by controlled introduction of air or a novel air-filled implant.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; Wade W Chien; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Effects of age and size in the ears of gekkotan lizards: auditory sensitivity, its determinants, and new insights into tetrapod middle-ear function.

Authors:  Yehudah L Werner; Lynda G Montgomery; Merav Seifan; James C Saunders
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 3.657

6.  Camera traps can be heard and seen by animals.

Authors:  Paul D Meek; Guy-Anthony Ballard; Peter J S Fleming; Michael Schaefer; Warwick Williams; Greg Falzon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The natural history of sound localization in mammals--a story of neuronal inhibition.

Authors:  Benedikt Grothe; Michael Pecka
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.492

8.  Does size matter? Examining the drivers of mammalian vocalizations.

Authors:  Kobe Martin; Marlee A Tucker; Tracey L Rogers
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  A Study of Wideband Energy Reflectance in Patients with Otosclerosis: Data from a Chinese Population.

Authors:  Suju Wang; Wenyang Hao; Chunxiao Xu; Daofeng Ni; Zhiqiang Gao; Yingying Shang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Functional anatomy of the middle and inner ears of the red fox, in comparison to domestic dogs and cats.

Authors:  Erich Pascal Malkemper; Matthew J Mason; Hynek Burda
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.610

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.