Literature DB >> 18238696

Experimental and theoretical evaluation of microbubble behavior: effect of transmitted phase and bubble size.

K E Morgan1, J S Allen, P A Dayton, J E Chomas, A L Klibaov, K W Ferrara.   

Abstract

Ultrasound contrast agents provide new opportunities to image vascular volume and flow rate directly. To accomplish this goal, new pulse sequences can be developed to detect specifically the presence of a microbubble or group of microbubbles. We consider a new scheme to detect the presence of contrast agents in the body by examining the effect of transmitted phase on the received echoes from single bubbles. In this study, three tools are uniquely combined to aid in the understanding of the effects of transmission parameters and bubble radius on the received echo. These tools allow for optical measurement of radial oscillations of single bubbles during insonation, acoustical study of echoes from single contrast agent bubbles, and the comparison of these experimental observations with theoretical predictions. A modified Herring equation with shell terms is solved for the time-dependent bubble radius and wall velocity, and these outputs are used to formulate the predicted echo from a single encapsulated bubble. The model is validated by direct comparison of the predicted radial oscillations with those measured optically. The transient bubble response is evaluated with a transducer excitation consisting of one-cycle pulses with a center frequency of 2.4-MHz. The experimental and theoretical results are in good agreement and predict that the transmission of two pulses with opposite polarity will yield similar time domain echoes with the first significant portion of the echo generated when the rarefactional half-cycle reaches the bubble.

Year:  2000        PMID: 18238696     DOI: 10.1109/58.883539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  71 in total

Review 1.  [Current developments in ultrasound technology].

Authors:  G Hetzel
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  A model for the dynamics of ultrasound contrast agents in vivo.

Authors:  Shengping Qin; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Material characterization of the encapsulation of an ultrasound contrast microbubble and its subharmonic response: strain-softening interfacial elasticity model.

Authors:  Shirshendu Paul; Amit Katiyar; Kausik Sarkar; Dhiman Chatterjee; William T Shi; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Contrast-enhanced and targeted ultrasound.

Authors:  Michiel Postema; Odd Helge Gilja
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Leveraging the power of ultrasound for therapeutic design and optimization.

Authors:  Charles F Caskey; Xiaowen Hu; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 9.776

6.  Radiation-force assisted targeting facilitates ultrasonic molecular imaging.

Authors:  Shukui Zhao; Mark Borden; Susannah H Bloch; Dustin Kruse; Katherine W Ferrara; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.488

7.  Observation of contrast agent response to chirp insonation with a simultaneous optical-acoustical system.

Authors:  Yang Sun; Shukui Zhao; Paul A Dayton; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  High-frequency dynamics of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Yang Sun; Dustin E Kruse; Paul A Dayton; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Asymmetric oscillation of adherent targeted ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Shukui Zhao; Katherine W Ferrara; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  Acoustic response from adherent targeted contrast agents.

Authors:  Shukui Zhao; Dustin E Kruse; Katherine W Ferrara; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.